This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
Aquitaine is currently one of the regions of France. Possibly, it was also the name of one of the provinces of France. Guyenne was a province. Thus, it is not correct to equate Aquitaine-region and Guyenne, although Aquitaine-province and Guyenne might be, but I am not sure about the latter. - User:Olivier
--Cchipman 19:50, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Eleanor of Aquitaine was not childless with Louis, but gave him two daughters. You can see the article on Louis VII, but it states that its Alix and Marie.
has anyone looked into the possibility of using image mapping to make the regional maps interactive? that way, someone could click on a region and it would bring them to the article about that region. it seems like the logical step because many people might not know the name of the region they want to find, just the general location. this would improve these sub-country pages a lot, i think.
This cleanup tag is for the Encyclopedia Britannica text dump added by Pwqn -- it needs substantial work to bring it up to modern standards. POV and language problems. Stbalbach04:10, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
English definitively not (except by expat Englishmen, particularly troops) because at that time the official language of England was French (Norman French?)
Latin was still a major "lingua franca" but in that Low Middle Ages period it was largely replaced by Occitan (Provenzal or maybe Languedocine) all along the Pyrenean region (north and south) as working language. I'm unsure about the use of French by Angevin aristocracy but it seems likely that Occitan was still more widely used as "official".
In Labourd, Basque was surely used at least as common language. In Gascony, people obviously spoke Gascon and dialects of it, which is often classified as Occitan but is very different from the other true Occitan dialects and never had the reputation of Provenzal and Languedocine (very simmilar to each other).
I don't have time to search for documentation but this picture seems a very likely: Ocitan and maybe some French with Latin as last resort, as "offcial" languages. Gascon and Basque in real life. --Sugaar12:14, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In the play-by-post game Medieval Diplomacy II, which, in the beginning, is set in approximately the year 1320, Aquitaine's leader is by default Duke John I. I cannot figure out who this guy is supposed to be. Does anyone know? Or did the game's creator simply make up the name or make a mistake or something? AThousandYoung08:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed the page states that the city of Pau is in Aquitaine. Correct me if I am wrong but Pau is the capital of the old province of Béarn which is/was never part either of Guyenne or, more importantly, is not even a part of the Région of Aquitaine? James Frankcom22:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pau is the capital of Béarn, but also precfeture of Pyrénées Atlantique, one of the Aquitaine's départements. Gascogne (Guyenne) and Aquitaine are not exactly the same area. Ginko09:10, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I was just thinking that this sentence here may require clarification:
Education, with universities at Pau and Bordeaux, which has over 80,000 students
Is that 80,000 students at Pau university, 80,000 students at Bordeaux university, or 80,000 combined total? It certainly confused me for a while... Thirsty Ferret19:07, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The statement "Aquitaine was quite thoroughly Romanized in its culture, unlike northern Gaul." was deleted with the summary non-sequitur " Aquitaine wasn't particularly Romanised - hence the survival of Basques". Someone else may want to struggle with this deleter with Attitude. --Wetman (talk) 14:47, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not me, at least not right now - but neither statement is particularly accurate. A few other notes: 'akwa is deemed a Proto-World word (for water), so pinning the etymology of any tribe with that as part of its name into any much later linguistic formation (like Latin or Basque) is pointless and really beyond the scope of this article. It should state that the people called themselves Aquitanes (be nice to know how they pronounced it), and who in the whole world knows that a "real Celt" is (especially as opposed to...Gallic Iberians?) Much work to be done here. There are references, someone interested in the history of Europe or France could have a lot of fun improving this article.--LeValley 04:44, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
I have just modified 2 external links on Aquitaine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
