![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The language of the article is unprofessional and makes quite a bit of grammar, spelling and punctuation mistakes, as well as your usual semantic confusions. It definitely needs a trusty hand for correction. 78.190.153.85 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:10, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Arabic prosody. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:39, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have deleted the following sentences:
The reason is that it makes no sense as it stands. It is unclear whether it refers to the arud writing or to the classification into different metres. Kanjuzi (talk) 13:27, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The three paragraphs at the end of the introduction seem to be an advertisement for Zaki Abdel-Malek's book, and (judging from the style, which is the same as the book) were evidently added by Dr Abdel-Malek himself. They read like an advertisement full of personal opinion rather than factual information. I am not convinced that this is proper for an encyclopedia. They certainly don't belong in the introduction, which ought to be a summary of the material included with greater detail in the rest of the article. For example: "Unfortunately, he failed to produce a coherent, integrated theory which satisfies the requirements of generality, adequacy, and simplicity". This is a statement of Dr Abdel-Malek's personal opinion; it is not the opinion of scholars in general. I suggest that the whole three paragraphs should be omitted and that an external link to Dr Abdel-Malek's book should be placed at the bottom of the page. Kanjuzi (talk) 14:42, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The page is literally same with Arabic prosody, it's just the Turkic version of it. Ahmetlii (talk) 21:43, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]