 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 17, 2011, February 17, 2012, February 17, 2013, February 17, 2015, February 17, 2017, February 17, 2018, and February 17, 2021. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Nude Descending a Staircase" was never named "Bride Stripped Bare by Her Bachelor's, even." In fact he painted the title, "Nu Descendant un Escalier", on the painting. (The World of Marcel Duchamp. Calvin Tompkins. Time-Life Books. 1966. p. 15.) --sparkit 18:33, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
The red ink does no good except to point out that there is no article...The italics identify the group. If you want to create an article about the group then do so and then wikify the link...Modernist (talk) 16:41, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies to Modernist. Also thank you Modernist for correcting the official name of the AAPS, I had quickly added it last evening because they weren't mentioned anywhere in the article on the Armory Show. But it has been my impression that the Red Ink means that something is important and it is open for other editors to contribute. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnlaur (talk • contribs) 17:35, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
we say 1300 works and at another (I think) 1250. Anyway, I'll try and discover one number that we can use and perhaps you can do the same? Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 00:19, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Although G. Borglum was one of the early organizer of the show, he eventually (as was his habit) fell out with the others involved and withdrew completely from the project. This process is spelled out in a chapter called Borglum shyly raises his veil. [1] His brother Solon did exhibit, though after he realized how radical the show was he asked that his pieces be removed. The organizers did not grant him his desire. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 20:14, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I just checked out a catalogue raisonne(reference to follow) to check out whether the artworks included here as in the show actually were included. Checked about 3/4ths of the pix, and whoever included these did a pretty good job. Do be careful about translated names and names changed over time or given to more than one work. Questionalbe inclusions are
I'll make the Rousseau change in title, be back with the ref, and remove the other 3 in about a week if they are not reasonably well documented. BTW - I got through Bellows (1909)
same ref as below pp.341-327. courtesy of Archives of American Art at editithon.
Will complete a bit more.
Completed checking through 1909 (took me awhile to figure it was chronological order!)
other questionable inclusions
Smallbones (talk) 19:58, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
An image used in this article, File:George Wesley Bellows 001.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
|
| A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:58, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
|
An image used in this article, File:WhistlersMother.jpeg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:42, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
to list all the artists who are blue links in the "List of artists" section and leave the red links at the List of artists in the Armory Show, an article which right now is cunningly divided into "Artist" and "More artists"? Should the Artists section there be the blue links and the More artists be the red ones? I say "Yes" to both the above thoughts, but you get a say too. If you hurry. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 21:58, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding recent edits, by Sternjon: This is not the place to advertise or promote new books (in this case by E. Lunday). However, if you would like to quote something of interest from the book, or share some aspects of the Armory Show (from the book) not yet included in this article, please do so. At that point your contribution will be reviewed by other editors. Until then the link you keep placing in this article will be removed. Coldcreation (talk) 21:06, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The Monhegan Historical and Cultural Museum Association on Monhegan Island, Maine is featuring an exhibition of paintings by Monhegan artists who participated in the Armory Show of 1913 and were influenced by it. The show is entitled "A Spirit of Wonder: Monhegan Artists and the 1913 Armory Show" and is open from July 1 - September 30, 2013. See website for further details: www.monheganmuseum.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.39.114.34 (talk) 18:28, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The lead section states that Roche “used his influence to convince Congress to overturn the 1909 Payne–Aldrich Tariff Act, which allowed him to stage” the Armory Show. It should be explained how the act would have prevented him from putting on the exhibition. (The answer is not to be found in the article on the act either.)—Quick and Dirty User Account (talk) 17:10, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I don't really understand the 1st sentence.Shouldn't "as a predecessor" be added? Or only my English is weak? 87.97.32.5 (talk) 09:33, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Armory Show. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{dead link}} tag to http://www.thearmoryshow.com/cgi-local/content.cgiWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:21, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article does not mention if any of the artists whose works were exhibited ever attended this event. Since it seems that the show was rather important, one would think that some of the artists would've attended.
Is there a way to find out which artists attended the Armory Show? (i.e., the "society pages" of the newspapers that covered the event ? )
Just curious. 2600:8800:786:A300:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 01:50, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article has "Citation needed" tags in the "Legacy" section. The criteria for B-class assessment states, "It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited.
. Otr500 (talk) 03:24, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The blockquote at the end of the lede (‘The origins of the show lie in the emergence of progressive groups…’ by Avis Berman) is not represented in the main article, and there seems no suitable place to transfer it to. I don’t understand why it is there. Valetude (talk) 00:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
