This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
I'd assume Cayley graphs are named for Arthur Cayley. Does anyone know for sure ( = have a reference)? --Dbenbenn 05:08, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Good guy! my uncle used to surf with him back in the 19th century! tbh tho, don't really like matrices. :/ Don't know what he was going for there — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jac8pussay (talk • contribs) 02:34, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am curious where the text for this article comes from. I would guess the bulk of it was not written by a Wikipedian; the style seems a bit dated. It would be nice to have sources for some of these quotes. Quasicharacter 07:22, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
On a related note, the mystery author (whom I shall name M.A.) doesn't seem to have a particularly NPOV. For instance, M.A. seems to have a grudge against "evolution philosophers". Quasicharacter 07:30, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Cayley genealogy: www.stirnet.com/HTML/genie/british/cc4aq/cayley2.htm shows that merchant Henry Cayley, father of mathematician Arthur Cayley, is NOT brother to aeronautical pioneer and Wikipedia subject Sir George Cayley (1773-1857).
It came from a book, verbatim. This is a Project Gutenberg PDF file of Lectures on Ten British Mathematicians of the 19th Century, by Alexander MacFarlane, written in 1915. It might be public domain by now, but should at least be credited. Some bits need reworking, too; there's first person in there, which is what started me searching. Good call about the "dated" style. -GTBacchus(talk)21:47, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This Article focuses too much on the circumstances of his life and not enough on summarizing his work. Granted, there are links to discussions of various aspects of his work, but a real overview is missing.
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Arthur Cayley/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Lengthy article, but it covers its topic well. The prose seems to be very clumsy at points, almost yoda-like(see the section about him receiving a chair at Cambridge). Besides this bit of oddness, a few in-line citations would really put this article on track for GA.--Cronholm14400:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Last edited at 00:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC).
Substituted at 08:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
The summary has him dying at age 73; the Collected Papers section(!) has him dying at 74. Someone who knows arithmetic could probably decide which of these is true. 192.87.1.200 (talk) 11:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
He was born in Aug 1821. His 74th birthday would have been in Aug of 1821 + 74 = 1895. Since he died a few months before his birthday, in Feb 1895, he was 73 at the time of his death. Feel free to fix the Collected Papers section. PatrickR2 (talk) 21:26, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
