This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kurdistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Kurdistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KurdistanWikipedia:WikiProject KurdistanTemplate:WikiProject KurdistanKurdistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Not really. The problem with the term "Rojava" is ambiguity. The police forces concerned here are under the authority of the respective cantons (!) within the framework of the Federation of Northern Syria - Rojava (NSR). So if anything, a move would have to be to Asayish (NSR cantons), maybe Asayish (Rojava cantons). But I would not find the move necessary anyway, because the NSR claims to be a model for all of Syria, and Assad does not own the term "Syria", so I think Asayish (Syria) is fine. -- 2A1ZA (talk) 18:24, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just looked at it again, I would support a renaming in Asayish (Rojava cantons), but definitely not in Asayish (Rojava), because the latter strongly suggests a factually incorrect allegiance of the forces. -- 2A1ZA (talk) 20:31, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Oppose, I have never heard of Asayish being referred as Internal Security Forces in the past. On social media and news platforms, they are always referred to as Asayish. Ecrusized (talk) 07:36, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.