Contents

Talk:Ashworth Archaeological Site

A fact from Ashworth Archaeological Site appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 November 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that excavation at the Ashworth Archaeological SiteinIndiana was halted because of the owner's religious beliefs? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ashworth Archaeological Site.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Archaeology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Indigenous peoples of North America This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Indiana Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Low-importance).

"This favorable weather, combined with its place as the first portion of Indiana to be reached by one ascending the Ohio River, caused the land within the boundaries of the modern county to have one of Indiana's heaviest concentrations of Pre-Columbian populations ..."

This appears to say that Pre-Contact peoples settled here because it is the first portion of Indiana reached by people going upstream. What do modern-day political boundaries have to do with where First Nations settled a half-millenium and more ago? 24.177.99.126 (talk) 22:02, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The point is that Posey County has one of Indiana's highest concentrations of Pre-Columbian populations. The sentence is intentionally only comparing the area with the rest of Indiana in order to demonstrate the importance of Posey County to Indiana archaeology: modern political boundaries are relevant in the context of conducting archaeology. Nyttend (talk) 02:46, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the site called "Ashworth"? Was it named after a nearby geographic feature, or the name of the family on whose land it is located? — Quicksilver^{T @} 17:10, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No clue; the sources don't mention the owner's name as of 1947, and the National Register nomination form says that it was divided among several people, none of whom were named "Ashworth". I doubt that it's the feature; while it could easily be the owner, it could also be the discoverer; sites such as the Tudek Site and the Walker Gilmore Site are named for their discoverers. Nyttend (talk) 21:01, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]