This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Directories, directory entries, electronic program guide, or a resource for conducting business.For example, an article on a radio station generally should not list upcoming events, current promotions, phone numbers, current schedules, etc., although mention of major events, promotions or historically significant programme lists and schedules may be acceptable. Furthermore, the Talk pages associated with an article are for talking about the article, not for conducting the business of the topic of the article. Wikipedia is not the yellow pages. Aepoutre15:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)User:Aepoutre 11:30 June 20, 2007 (EST)[reply]
Sure, no problem. History, faculty and staff, and external links are all too long, undoubtedly contain unwanted or irrelevant information, are perhaps redundant, and mean nothing without a real reflist. Regardless of citation or length, there is nothing encyclopedic about a list of faculty and staff. Thanks for all your contributions, Steve. One thing I'd certainly recommend is not to just add weblinks, but to use the ref tags, and name those links within the ref tag. I can help you with all of this if you don't know how to make references, a reflist, etc. While I haven't read all of it, be careful that editing for style means encyclopedic and NPOV wording, not editorial statements. I would've done much of this myself (I tend to edit and Wikify a lot of Nazarene articles myself), but the sheer insanity of its current nature rather overwhelms me. Thanks so much for doing this! Aepoutre15:17, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 2 external links on Asia-Pacific Nazarene Theological Seminary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
