This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
Looks like it has been done by an IP. See Diff1 and Diff2. The attribution templates needs to be placed though. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:48, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I've just been reading a few things on India, having been there in the past, and hoping to go there after COVID settles down. I'm an Australian and English is my 1st language. I just want to improve the flow of the text. I don't think got or get should be used in formal English.
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
The Sikh involvement was previously included in this article but has now been removed. It was well sourced and no clear reason was given for its removal. If there is no objection I shall restore the information. What are other people’s thoughts? Should the information be restored or not? CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 16:54, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If there is no disagreement then I will ahead with the proposed changes. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 22:48, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What are your proposed changes? — DaxServer (t · m · c) 07:24, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Restoring previous version by reverting the latest edit. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 08:19, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide quotes from the source to support your text — DaxServer (t · m · c) 11:52, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All sources used are available on the internet archive or by a simple google search. If you cannot find them I will provide links.
"J&K, LTTE and Punjab ultras spoke of a plan to assassinate Rajiv." From Rajiv Gandhi killing: Jain Commission investigates likelihood of wider conspiracy
“So Mahant went and met Jagjit Singh Chauhan on the December 26th 1990 who took him to the Khalistani Headquarters in London. There, around 10-12 people were seated including allegedly belonging to the Babbar Khalsa (a Sikh militant organization), militants from the LTTE, the JKLF and a few other organizations. Jagjit reportedly told Mahant that he was going to eliminate Rajiv Gandhi in Delhi and that Chandraswami would be financing the assassination… Further to this, immediately after the assassination on the May 22nd 1991, Mahant from Punjabi Bhawan had spoken to Jagjit who confirmed that he was the person responsible for Rajiv's assassination. On the basis of this telephonic conversation, Mahant had written a letter to the President of India mentioning that it was the Sikh militants who had been responsible for Rajiv's assassination.” From Stranger than Fiction: The Rajiv Gandhi Assassination
“During their conversation, Chauhan told him about his role in RG’s assassination and said that he had got him killed… It would mean that LTTE and Khalistan militants had co- ordination and it was a joint conspiracy which was executed by LITE… The above intelligence reports emanating from RAW clearly make the picture that, after the Indo-Sri Lankan agreement, both the militant outfits, LTTE and Khalistani, were interacting with each other and their common target was Rajiv Gandhi.” From Rajiv Gandhis Assassination The Mystery Unfolds
Jain Commission report observed on page 119 vide para 3.63 of vol Il:
“The information conveyed through this telegram no doubt nowhere states that there was any collaboration between the LTTE or Khalistan militants, but both have been named in the information emanating from Mr. Yasser Arafat and if this information is read along with Indian intelligence reports and the above press release, an inference may arise that both of them may have joined in targeting Sh. Rajiv Gandhi.”
”According to July 1995 testimony received by the Jain Commission inquiry into the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi, Khalistani (Sikh separatist) leader Jagjit Singh Chauhan reported that the LTTE and the Khalistani Liberation Force were co-conspirators in the assassination plot against Rajiv Gandhi.” From Terrorism is Comes from Us by Barathkumar PKT CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 13:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The first one is a quote from a political leader. The second one Stranger than Fiction is WP:SPS, let's not get into that. The fourth - Jain Commission report - please provide secondary sources that deduce and support your text. Third and fifth, I don't have access to them to read thru the entire context, so no comments. I'm searching for the credentials of the authors, but not very successful.
I'm going to question the veracity in your claims. There're more than a thousand high quality sources on RG assassination (JSTOR and Google Scholar each). When I search explicitly for "rajiv gandhi assassination AND khalistani", I got only a handful of results - almost all of them are bad search results and thus are not valid. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 16:50, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Like I asked at the end above, please provide other sources which corroborate your text, which apparently don't exist from my initial search. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:54, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I found a many more sources news sources, but it seems Sikh involvement is more of just a theory than a fact. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 12:56, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Done Placed the attribution templates. See diff1 and diff2 --Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:51, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
