This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Australian Museum is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
There is an absence of detailed, factual information concerning this museum's holdings, historically and at present. Also, what is the history of the building, along with everything else one might find in a WP article about a major museum? Is this even a major museum? The SJW emphasis of the article constitutes undue emphasis, and seems to have killed off any further interest in improving it. Is there any shortage of WP:Reliable source coverage of this institution?--Quisqualis (talk) 17:48, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yesterday (3 January 2024), the Australian Museum released an update statement stating that after consultation with the exhibition's curator, they will not modify the text regarding the term “Palestine”, see https://australian.museum/about/organisation/media-centre/ramses-text-panel-statement/. I haven't seen this latest update covered in any other news outlets yet, other than the initial SMH article already referenced in the article's controversy section.