Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 This is a pretty patchy article  
1 comment  




2 Babylonia: Persian?!, so what happened to Iraq?  
2 comments  




3 babylonian and aztec  
1 comment  




4 Genesis 10:10  
1 comment  




5 Gnosticism  
2 comments  




6 Pronunciation  
1 comment  




7 Sources for future article expansion  
2 comments  




8 External links modified  
1 comment  




9 Help  
2 comments  




10 Social  
1 comment  













Talk:Babylonia




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


This is a pretty patchy article[edit]

AMORITE PERIOD - There is not much detail about the Amorite dynasty, apart from Hammurabi

KASSITE PERIOD - Same as above really, pretty basic and patchy. Someone removed the detailed rev because of "Assyrian bias" lol...i never saw any tbh.

OTHER DYNASTIES - The current version just ignores them

NEO BABYLONIAN EMPIRE - Most of this is about PERSIA???

The whole article is patchy and doesnt contain much detail at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EddieDrood (talkcontribs) 14:26, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Babylonia: Persian?!, so what happened to Iraq?[edit]

So why didn't the writer say that Babylonia was completely PERSIAN?!, this includes much fatal errors and remember that you can not trust all websites of the sources you've used (writer), we can not include something from our own, the Iraqi Wikipedians must help us in this or the Iraqi history will go out like this!.

Quite probably because Persians are an Iranic Indo-European people, and Babylonians were Semites and remnants of the Sumerians that spoke a non-IE language? Just a thought. HammerFilmFan (talk) 19:01, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Because Babylonia wasn't completely Persian. It continued to use Cuneiform, Aramaic, and develop Babylonian sciences. Persians didn't come en masse to Mesopotamia until 800 A.D. 64.222.113.252 (talk) 20:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC)John Dee[reply]

babylonian and aztec[edit]

I seen a program on the history chanel saying that the aztecs are actualy babylonian in decent so that would mean that they are not native to america that they migrated here just like the early europeans they had to have done a blood test or something to figure this out can anyone confirm this?68.116.91.31 (talk) 02:52, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FORUM

Genesis 10:10[edit]

The Book of Genesis, 10:10 states "The first centers of his kingdom were Babylon, Uruk, Akkad and Kalneh, in Shinar. Does this refer to "Babylonia" or "Babylon" (I believe they are the same thing).[1] Twillisjr (talk) 03:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, in this instance the reference is to the city of Babylon, not the region/state of Babylonia. However, Babylon was not located in Sumer (Shinar.)

References

Gnosticism[edit]

IsGnosticism the religion of Babylonians? Early Iraq is supposedly connected to this religion and a few scholarly articles do mention it as being practiced in Babylonia. Does anyone else know if this is the case and where to add it?

Twillisjr (talk) 14:26, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite. If we read Gnosticism we see it properly refers to a religion that began to spread around the year 100 AD, in the eastern Roman Empire. I think there may be groups in Iraq today that were influenced by them, but it is an anachronism for Babylonia, which is going back to 500-1800 BC. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 14:47, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation[edit]

The one given was only accurate for some parts of American English. Rather than laundry list the variants, leave it for the Wiktionary entry and remember Wikipedia is WP:NOTADICTIONARY. We should only include pronunciations where well-meaning readers could be genuinely confused. Is there anyone who's going to read this as baby-lone-ee-AH? If so, reïnclude the IPA, but include sourcing and the "British" pronunciation with the short I which is also shared by many Americans. — LlywelynII 02:57, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for future article expansion[edit]

WP:Further reading sections are almost always a bad idea since Wikipedia doesn't have any experts curating them and they gradually and unhelpfully bloat. Kindly restore these to the article as they are used to verify points being made:

If the further reading section is being recreated, include a gloss about each work explaining how exactly these works are more helpful than a Google search to someone learning about the topic. — LlywelynII 02:57, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's also more info at the EB articles (and EB material already in the article that needs to be cited to them), but do keep in mind that some points may be dated. — LlywelynII 03:14, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Babylonia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help[edit]

How I can use this source[1] on this article?

See Wikipedia:Citing sources and the associated templates. Dimadick (talk) 20:06, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dimadick, I mean, which section of this article I can use this source's information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shahanshah5 (talkcontribs) 10:29, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Babylonians and Assyrians : life and customs. ISBN 9781108082365. ...Berossus, the Chaldean historian, tells us that after the creation it was peopled by a mixture of races, and we read in the book of Genesis that Babel, or Babylon, was the first home of the manifold languages of mankind

Social[edit]

Collect the more information of babylonia and sumerians 223.184.76.27 (talk) 14:01, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Babylonia&oldid=1212530180"

Categories: 
C-Class vital articles
Wikipedia level-4 vital articles
Wikipedia vital articles in History
C-Class level-4 vital articles
Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in History
C-Class vital articles in History
C-Class Iraq articles
Top-importance Iraq articles
WikiProject Iraq articles
C-Class Ancient Near East articles
Top-importance Ancient Near East articles
Ancient Near East articles by assessment
C-Class former country articles
WikiProject Former countries articles
 



This page was last edited on 8 March 2024, at 09:17 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki