Contents

Talk:Backstaff

	This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Astronomy Bottom‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Bottom This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.

Question

[edit]

how many people used the backstaff?

It was one of the main instruments in navigation from the early 17^th century to the mid-18^th century, when it was replaced by the octant (instrument) and sextant. It was widely used. Michael Daly 22:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Oxford English Dictionary famously lists the word davids staff as one of its most egregious own goals. Supposedly the name is simply davis' staff translated to german, and mistranslated back to english from german, by someone unaware of the english term. Should the article mention Davis' staff and/or Davids staff and/or the OED spurious entry? I don't see Davis' staff or Davids staff being redirects into this article... -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 04:51, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is the relation of Backstaff to the Back observation quadrant? I am not pro on this subject,but am trying to understand. Can this be clarified in some way? LasseS (talk) 11:29, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's not much of a relationship really. The Back observation quadrant is a simple quadrant where shadows from the sun are used to measure the angle. The other backstaves all have a staff as part of their design. Those with a staff will be lighter and less affected by wind than a solid plate quadrant of the same general size.--Michael Daly (talk) 20:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Backstaff and cross staff are two completely different instruments (see:Willem Frederik Jacob Mörzer Bruyns; Richard Dunn (2009). Sextants at Greenwich: a catalogue of the mariner's quadrants, mariner's astrolabes, cross-staffs, backstaffs, octants, sextants, quintants, reflecting circles and artificial horizons in the National Maritime Museum, Greenwich. Oxford University Press. pp. 72–. ISBN 978-0-19-953254-4. Retrieved 16 September 2011.) All the beatifull aported portuguese references "A balestilha" deal completely about pt:balestilha K. M. Mathew (1988). History of the Portuguese navigation in India, 1497-1600. Mittal Publications. pp. 16–. ISBN 978-81-7099-046-8. Retrieved 16 September 2011. --Mcapdevila (talk) 11:29, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Backstaff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721195410/http://www.dehilster.info/instrumenten/masterhood/sis_article_master_hood.pdftohttp://www.dehilster.info/instrumenten/masterhood/sis_article_master_hood.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:27, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Backstaff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080622142123/http://www.mcallen.lib.tx.us/books/seasecr/dseasec0.htmtohttp://www.mcallen.lib.tx.us/books/seasecr/dseasec0.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:58, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]