 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Where did that information about Aguinaldo declaring it capital come from? It was capital of the Philippines during the British Occupation from 1762-1764 and not the Revolution!
Ferdinand Blumentritt? Not the acquaintance of Jose Rizal from Austria?--Jondel (talk) 04:36, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Feb. 11, 2013 Chris Sommers, Victoria BC, Canada
American Occupation period - William Howard Taft was not a "Com.", he was the first American Governors General of the Philippines and had never served in the military. "General Grant" was President Grant from 1869-1877. I believe Admiral Dewey arrived in Manila Bay in 1898 and destroyed the Spanish fleet on May 1st of that year...The President at the time was William McKinley, who would be succeeded by Theodore Roosevelt in the fall of 1901. The US military commander when Taft was Governors General was Leonard Wood, who would g oon to found Baguio City as the American "summer capitol",creating the groundwork and infrastructure for the institutions that make it the "education capitol of the Philippines".
What else in this article is fiction or just plain wrong? This is, ultimately, the real problem with Wikipedia - unless one is an expert on the topic they're reading, they're not going to know the nonsense from the truly scholarly and credible articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisSommers (talk • contribs) 11:41, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Bacolor, Pampanga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{dead link}} tag to http://lawph.com/statutes/ra1519.html{{dead link}} tag to http://www.baculud.com/historical-sites/municipal-building/{{dead link}} tag to http://www.baculud.com/historical-sites/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If what this report says is true, then the process of renaming this article should be conducted. Thank you.
On this town’s 440th founding anniversary and 25 years after the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo’s eruptions and lahar almost obliterated it, officials here passed laws reverting to the name and seal given by King Carlos III of Spain in 1765. So starting Thursday, Bacolor’s name is once again Villa de Bacolor. The old name Baculud (high ground), however, is still permissible. Its official seal is again the Spanish royal coat-of-arms, set in yellow this time. Built and displayed at the facade of the town hall, the seal announces the motto, “Pluribus Unum, Non Plus Ultra” (Out of Many, No Further and Beyond) to indicate that Bacolor was among Spain’s most favored towns. It is one of five Philippine places that was given the title “villa” (city).[1] 202.90.136.30 (talk) 01:34, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Villa de Bacolor, Pampanga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:17, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 | It was proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.
result:
This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}}
|
– Updated WP:MOSPHIL now allows <city name> only format for Philippine towns. Per precedent with RM's earlier this year such as those of Talk:Cagdianao and Talk:Baliuag. And also the following bold moves made by some Wikipedians before (not exhaustive):
READERSHIP STATS AS OF 09/19/2020, 9:00 AM (PHILIPPINE STANDARD TIME/UTC+8)
Per Wikipedia:ONEOTHER (brought forth at the requested move for Pateros), since there are only two entries bearing this exact name, there's no need for redundant disambiguation pages once these two municipality articles are moved to <cityname> format article title JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:21, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
*'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
