| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bahrain World Trade Center article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on April 8, 2013 and April 8, 2016. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Edits by User:MoeFe constituted copyright violation. They cut and pasted copyrighted text from here and here, that was otherwise not cited. I reverted the edits, he reverted back, and I reverted again. If it happens again, I will report the user, having made him aware that copyright violations are unacceptable and against WP:POLICY. DJLayton4 (talk) 17:45, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Timsdad,
Your move for removing the Moda Mall section and changing the "template" was smart and good. The reason i added the recently-removed "Introduction" headline is because it is a common mistake, and it is needed in general articles. Please see this, this and this for ideas of proper formatting of articles. No harm done, i'm just pointing out common mistakes which most of us make... One good example for keeping an "Introduction" headline is: when the "introduction" (or "first ideas", in other words) paragraph/section is too large, the Contents tab will be automatically adjusted to be placed under the entire text, not on top (which is the usual place for contents). The general formatting of any encyclopedic article (whether a book, or Wikipedia itself) requires a leading headline (to lead the relevant article), and (as you can see for yourself) it is also difficult to link lvl-2 headlines if these are missing, and it also looks odd. I'm not totally opposing your openions, it's just that this is a common mistake which should be avoided. But in some areas, the level-2 headline is not that necessary (just like this article), but still placing one gives a general idea and also makes the article look more neater in-turn. All comments welcome. Have a good day. --Rehman (talk) 11:25, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding information about the Moda Mall section that is being added and reverted: There is no reason why there shouldn't be a section on the Moda Mall, a bit of information. But making a list of the stores in the mall is not the right thing to be doing on Wikipedia. If anyone wishes to include the Moda Mall somewhere, find some references and write a proper article. Thanks, timsdad 03:28, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Who ever edited what I corrected on this page please turn it back to the way it was. If any of you were higher than construction manager on this project then I give you the full right to say what you want but if not please get and keep the right info on this page. Murray & Roberts Nass was the joint venture for construction. Any further questions on this project please mail me. Kind regards. Barend. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Barend D K (talk • contribs) 22:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
An image used in this article, File:Bahrain WTC day.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011
|
| A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:51, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
\bdesignbuild-network\.com\b on the local blacklistIf you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:30, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 21:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
