| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bando article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Each of Bando, Bando kickboxing and bando yoga do not have enough to make a worthwhile article and they are strongly related. Far better to have something that can develop into a reasonable article than a series of stubs. The kickboxing and yoga versions would still exist as redirects and be their own subsections.
It might make sense to merge the Bando Kickboxing and Bando topics but much more can be added to the Bando article, and Bando Kickboxing should be eliminated or consolidated with the Lethwei topic as they are the same thing. Bando could be considered similar to the term Kungfu. Bando encompasses a wide range of combative styles, and where there is redundancy the articles should be consolidated. I don't really agree with the yoga consolidation though. This is not part of the Martial System, it is a "healing" system with a separate history even though it may intersect with the martial system. The yoga systems, include "Dhanda yoga", "Longi yoga", and additional subdivisions. TheUglyAmerican 16:31, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense - there is a lot of stuff on Bando in the Burmese martial arts article that should be shifted over. So - I did my best sorting things out but expect I messed up somewhere along the way. My impression was that the original author was a bit indiscriminate but hopefully with what I did this topic can grow properly.Peter Rehse 00:07, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Someone added some what seemed like ethnocentric information regarding Japan's influence on Burmese martial arts. I altered the content, as the Burmese arts can be traced back to around the time of Christ. There was some cross cultural exchange between the Burmese and Japanese, but all martial arts were developed and refined through conflict. The Chinese, Tibet, Thai, and Indian arts all contributed in the development, so saying that because there was trade with Okinawa in the 1700s means there was significant development or influence by the Japanese makes no sense. The Burmese Empires fought many wars, and have their own history. Infact it is more likely that the Japanes arts were ifluenced by the migration of Martial Arts and Buddhism through South East Asia via Burma (Myanmar), Thailand (Siam), etc.... TheUglyAmerican 21:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)TheUglyAmerican[reply]
As previously stated, it is more likely that the Burmese had an influence on the Japanese styles than the other way around. Either way it is speculation. Burmese martial history goes back prior to the time of Christ. There is imperical evidence of this developement through the Pyu empire. I don't think the Japanese arts can be traced back that far, other than through thier migration from India via Burma, China, etc.... TheUglyAmerican 18:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bando. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:25, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
