This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bangladesh genocide article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
![]() | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on December 14, 2011. |
![]() | This article has previously been nominated to be moved.
|
@Worldbruce: This 3 million figure has been debunked. Read this article. "the official Bangladeshi estimate of “3 lakhs” (300,000) was wrongly translated into English as 3 million". That appears to be the case. Ratnahastin (talk) 10:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Whether he mistranslated "lakh" as "million" or his confused state of mind was responsible I don't know). David Bergman notes in [1] and [2] that the 3 million figure came from Pravda (quoting Syed Anwarul Karim) and denies that Rahman was the source. Pravda first reported the 3 million figure on 3 January 1972 [3], while Rahman met Mujib five days later (8 January 1972), so this seems quite plausible.
Within 267 days it killed about 1,500,000 people
Pakistan's Islamic military regime murdered probably 300,000 and possibly 1 million fellow Muslims and minority Hindus in Bangladesh in 1971.
The systematic violence and widespread destruction executed by the Pakistani army, with the assistance of local supporters, ... resulted in the deaths of at least 1 million Bengalis.
The campaign of murder, rape, and pillage that continued until December 1971 caused 1 to 3 million deaths.
It can hardly have exceeded one million and is likely to have been slightly higher than 500,000.
Estimates of the number of victims vary greatly, from 300,000 to 3 million.
At least one million Bengalis, perhaps as many as three million, were massacred by the security forces of West Pakistan, assisted by local allies.
Estimates of the death toll vary widely, from 300,000 deaths to over 1 million. Bangladeshi authorities claim that 3 million were killed.Malerisch (talk) 11:54, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or|ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Kindly change the description from "1971 genocide of Bengalis by Pakistan" to "1971 genocide of Bengalis by Pakistan Army". And please, also remove the Category:Persecution of Hindus by Muslims, because although the main target were Hindus, the Bengali Muslims were also targeted by the Pakistan army in this genocide. Therefore, the Category:Massacres of Bengali Hindus in East Pakistan is sufficient there. I think that Category:Persecution of Bengali Muslims should also be added in the article. 103.169.65.150 (talk) 18:47, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or|ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the sentence where it says “especially Bengali Hindus”, it’s not factual. Bengali Hindus were one of the least targeted people. It was the actual Bangladeshi people who were targeted, the Bangladeshis who reside in Bangladesh now and are Muslim. Please do not take away the sacrifice of the Bangladeshi people by stating that. 24.51.233.131 (talk) 13:00, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''
(talk|contribs) 13:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]Why did a writer delete the word 'especially' and add the word 'including' in the 1st sentence? The word 'especially' sounds better there. Weren’t hindus especially targeted? Use the word 'especially' there. Science, History & Politics (talk) 06:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]