This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Basilica of Saint Francis of Assisi is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
The frescoes in the upper and lower churches of Basillica of San Francesco d'Assisi were painted by different artists. According to Frederick Hartt and David G. Wilkins in "History of Italian Renaissance Art," the "Master of the Saint Francis Cycle" is responsible for work in the upper chapel and Pietro Lorenzetti contributed to the lower.
This was an unsigned message by : 20:52, 29 January 2006 68.89.68.221
I cannot comprehend the unencyclopedic persistence that makes editors continue to attach the name Giotto to the frescoes in an unequivocal manner, even when this article (and everything else) makes it clear his authorship is in doubt. I am referring specifically to the caption of the interior view which is labelled, "upper church with Giotto's frescoes".
The Assisi website, which seems to be quoted or misquoted here, (without citation) mentions Giotto's possible authorship of the Isaac frescoes. It states in this article that the idea that the St Francis frescoes are not by Giotto is based on the attribution of the Isaac frescoes to Giotto, and the dissimilarity between the two.
This may have once been a case in the mind of some art historian.... I don't know, and can't imagine who. The fact is that of all the Upper Church nave frescoes, the ones that are the least like Giotto's work and which are almost always attributed to some other artist are the "Isaac frescoes". Few current art historians would now attribute them to him. They are referred to as the work of the Isaac Master, and the artists that have been explored as possible authors are Cavallini, Cimabue and Gaddo Gaddi. In my opinion they are by Cavallini or a close follower.
A number of the frescoes have been discounted as the work of Giotto because they employ white lead, which he did use in any fresco of which authorship is certain.
3. It is sometimes suggested that Giotto devised the scheme and that his pupils executed it, or some such. This seems to be an unnecessary supposition. The different compositions don't look as if they were devised by the same hand. They look as if they were all designed by different artists, but with certain agreements. In my opinion, for what its worth, Giotto was there alright... how could he keep away?
Amandajm (talk) 12:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Giotto problem is explained in Grove Dictionary of Art. The reasoning followed in this authoritative dictionary is followed here to dispute, where necessary, the authorship of Giotto. Italian sources (especially touristic guides) tend to lean towards the authorship of Giotto (for understandable reasons). However, whatever we state in this article must be based on references. JoJan (talk) 15:34, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 2 external links on Basilica of Saint Francis of Assisi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
