This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. stateofGeorgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Took my stab at wikifying this page. Did some fact checking and most of it seems accurate enough. Linked like crazy, and adjusted where the quotes come in. Also added the link at the bottom to wikiquote. I'll leave it for a few days and then remove the header if no one sees a problem with it.
bdgrell 07:56, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)
I realize that almost all, if not all, units were enormously under strength by this time, but I count five Union units ("regiments"). The total is given as a few thousand, or about 400+ per unit. Does this sound about right for this period? Student7 (talk) 18:12, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, although a regiment usually started the war with 1000 men, disease and battle casualties reduced them in size significantly. Unlike the practice in later American wars, losses were usually not replaced in existing units. New regiments were formed with new recruits. Hal Jespersen (talk) 18:53, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Battle of Allatoona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
