This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Some new primary sources have come to light, hence some small edits to the Anholt article. If there are factual errors that my post is deemed to have made, please substantiate these changes by quoting source material. I was surprised that Captain Torrens of the Royal Marines was not mentioned in the article. Keith H99 (talk) 23:14, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As read from the new (2011) memorial on Anholt - see reference to photos under consequences - 32 named officers and men were recorded as killed or who died of their wounds due to the Battle of Anholt 1811, as recorded by the Danish Authorities, and buried on Anholt.
This compares with the contemporary British report of "between thirty and forty buried" plus twentythree severely wounded of which three have since died of their wounds". Viking1808 (talk) 16:04, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The consequences section is rife with UK bias and on the whole the article favours the British sources of the day (which were certainly partial to the Empire, just as we are to some of our social and political structures today). Victors may have had a monopoly on history in the times of the papyrus and the printing press, but I don't see why we should let that be the case with today's knowledge and technology. RhoDaZZ (talk) 16:11, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The url for the memorial from 2011 has changed and is now updated (it was correct on the Danish wikipedia equivalent article). Viking1808 (talk) 19:10, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Battle of Anholt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
