![]() | Battle of Auberoche is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | Battle of Auberoche is part of the Gascon campaign of 1345 series, a featured topic. It is also part of the Hundred Years' War, 1345–1347 series, a featured topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 2, 2019. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:29, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What are you doing? Are you rewriting our history based on what you think should have happened? KileyMitchell79 (talk) 20:30, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
What the heck is going on? I think the reader should be given a caption explaining the image, not just alt-text. Mattximus (talk) 23:48, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Just because you change it in writings doesn't mean that's how it was. History is there to learn from so we can do batter next time and learn from our mistakes. If you keep changing everything how are we suppose to show are children what works and what doesnt? We need all of our past to make a better future. KileyMitchell79 (talk) 20:35, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The article contains the following, "Before the war commenced well over 1,000 ships a year departed Gascony. Among their cargoes were over 200,000,000 imperial pints (110,000,000 litres; 240,000,000 US pints) of wine. (refs: Rodger 2004 pp=xix–xx, 79; Curry 2002 p=40)", which has been copy/pasted into a number of articles. I have edited it because it is wrong in several ways; it is OR, relies on a synthesis of the sources, and gives the wrong amount anyway. This was discussed at length a couple of years ago, but the wrong information is still here, so I have fixed it, here and elsewhere. Moonraker12 (talk) 17:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]