The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that during the Battle of Neville's Cross, King David II of Scotland was shot twice in the face by arrows and taken prisoner after knocking out the teeth of his captor?
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medieval Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Medieval Scotland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Medieval ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject Medieval ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject Medieval ScotlandMedieval Scotland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject North East England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North East EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject North East EnglandTemplate:WikiProject North East EnglandNorth East England articles
If I can get an accurate list of the casualities, then I'll add a "Battlebox" for this as well. (I'm likely going to use the "no campaign" version, as this battle, while important, doesn't typically appear to be listed as a major battle of the Hundred Years War.) I should be able to find one soon enough. RobertM52508:15, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I can't find casualties estimates after all, so I'm going to post a "Battlebox" with as much info in it as I have. I'd prefer otherwise, but I can't find the information so there doesn't appear to be much of a choice for me. RobertM52507:23, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Do we know exactly where in modern Neville's Cross the battlefield was located, so it can be compared to modern landmarks for identification? I assume there must be some sort of plaque up to pinpoint the site, but I don't myself recall ever seeing anything, or whether the site is still visible or built over. This information might be of interest to readers, especially if anyone wants to visit the site. DWaterson21:04, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
From the end of Crossgate the road leads across the Browney to Brancepeth. The land between the river and end of Margery Lane is dotted with modern villas, and suburban roads now cross the site of the battle of Neville's Cross. Both Scots and English were drawn up in line on Bearpark (fn. 29) Moor, between the city and the manor-house. Much of the fighting centred on the Red Hills, enclosed land belonging to the Priory (fn. 30) and now cut through by the railway line. The Prior and some of his monks took their stand 'a litle distant from a pece of ground called ye flashe above a close lying hard by north Chilton poole and on ye north side of ye hedge where ye maydes bower had wont to be.' (fn. 31) Here they displayed St. Cuthbert's corporax case and prayed for an English victory. (fn. 32) The Scots were routed by Ralph Lord Nevill and his fellows, King David was badly wounded in the face, and according to tradition he fled down to the Browney and hid under a narrow stone bridge near Aldin Grange, but was there betrayed by his shadow on the water. (fn. 33) However this may be, the King was taken captive by John de Copeland, a Northumberland esquire and husband of one of the heirs of Crook Hall. (fn. 34) In commemoration of his victory Lord Nevill set up the cross whence the district takes its name. (fn. 35) This monument was broken down one night in 1589 (fn. 36) by 'some lewde and contemptuous wicked persons,' but the stump remained in its old position until 1903, when it was moved to a new mound a few yards distant.St Oswalds, Vol 3, Victoria County History for Durham - I think that's the best you'll get.
I have a recollection of being told that the site is roughly where the Duke of Wellington pub now stands - certainly there seems to be the highest point of the area, give or take. The railway is about half a mile north of that, past Crossgate Peth. Shimgray | talk | 23:25, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I was recently searching for this battlefield in Durham and found a bridge over Newcastle Road near Moor Edge. If you come from Redhills Lane and turn right to Newcastle Road there is a bridge with a sign that says that the Battle of Neville's Cross where fought here in 1346. The location for the bridge is 54°46'41.36"N and 1°35'54.11"W.
Shakespeare-and the Archbishop-is confusing his kings!. David II was never taken to France. That dubious honour belongs to James I-taken prisoner in 1406-who accompanied Henry V on some of his campaigns. Rcpaterson23:35, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What is Neville's Cross? In one part of the article, the cross is referred to as an ancient Anglo-Saxon cross. Later, the article says that the cross was erected AFTER the battle to commemorate the English victory. I suspect the former is accurate (why name the battle after a cross put up to commemorate the battle?).
Encyclopedia Britannica (1888) says Philippa of Hainault led 12,000 Britons at the battle and captured David. Has new evidence come to light to lower the number of troops and exclude her from this battle?
Mr. Guye, I would be extremely hesitant to take the unsupported word of a more-than-147-year-old source. Obviously I consulted a pretty wide range of more recent sources, and I found no mention of any involvement by Philippa in the battle. Equally obviously I won't have looked at everything, so this is up for a change if it can be sourced to a high-quality RS. (The "high-quality" bit is a specifically FA requirement.) But ATM it looks like an unsupported 150-year-old outlier, which wouldn't even get a mention in order to be debunked. Cheers and feel free to keep poking. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:31, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A section was added on the local legend that walking nine times around the cross allows a person to hear the sounds of the battle. This was sourced and was removed, but should be reinstated. 94.173.250.139 (talk) 23:13, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why? It is of no relevance to the battle, which is the topic of this article; it was partially unsourced; the part which was sourced was to a 140 year old work which does not meet the reliable source threshold; and the deleted material failed several FAC criteria. As just explained here. Nor has it gathered a sufficient consensus to overcome that of the FAC review. Gog the Mild (talk) 23:27, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
