This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
I have created a sandbox for this article with several proposed changes. These changes include basic grammatical corrections, corrections regarding punctuation around dates and times, and stylistics change regarding a more NPOV. The article itself still requires more historical content regarding the battle itself. Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dietszche/sandbox
Since the battle's details and participants are fairly complex, suggest that this section be broken up into several subsections. I did so in edits.--DDenes (talk) 01:30, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the Wikipedia standard is sentence type capitalization for section headings; that is, first word capitalized, other words not. DDenes (talk) 05:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I totally fix 25 spelling and grammar mistakes
I fixed some punctuation, grammar, spelling, cohesion, tone, and style problems through the whole articles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xiaoxizheng (talk • contribs) 02:06, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have corrected the English throughout the article, I think without intruding any important errors regarding facts, but I'm not an expert on the subject, and it ought to be checked by someone who is.
I have a couple of particular questions. First, I had to rewrite the sentence about what Bercsenyi commanded to make it make sense, but the changes may not be correct.
On the peasants being armed with rifles: a rifle was a pretty expensive weapon at that time, and low-grade firearms should have been some sort of smoothbore musket. Is this due to an error in translation, or did the original say "rifles"? Wallace McDonald (talk) 22:35, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]