Contents

Talk:Battle of Zenta

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Zenta article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Ottoman / Early Modern This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Ottoman military history task force Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800) Serbia High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Turkey Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Hungary High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Former countries: Holy Roman Empire / Ottoman Empire This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles This article is supported by the Holy Roman Empire task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Ottoman Empire (assessed as High-importance).

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 11, 2008, September 11, 2021, and September 11, 2022.

@Qaayush529 Please do not edit a citation to make it say something not supported by the source. It is important to maintain text–source WP:INTEGRITY and Wikipedia:Verifiability. The citation from the source says: "The victory ultimately led to the 1699 Treaty of Karlowitz, which signalled the end of Ottoman dominance in Europe."[1] not the end of Ottoman threat in central Europe. The content in the article as been edited to reflect the source used. Please follow WP guidelines and discus on TP if you wish, thank you. Aeengath (talk) 13:43, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think I did provided the reasoning for the edit and the current underlying problem in that statement. Oh well anyways 103.81.215.214 (talk) 15:06, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You did and your reasoning made sense but articles on WP cannot contain original research and the material presented needs to be directly supported by sources. Aeengath (talk) 16:13, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]