Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 The antiquity section is bizzare.  
1 comment  




2 subjected to ancientness.  
3 comments  




3 Rework of the Economics Section  
1 comment  













Talk:Bavaria




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


The antiquity section is bizzare.

[edit]

1. Old Bavarian didn't become Old High German. It is classified as such among other German dialects like Allemannic.

2. The bavarians are basically elbe Germanic in their origin with a strong celtic and a smaller roman substrate. They obviously migrated there at some point. It's even sourced in the linked pages of the Germanic peoples that the bavarians supposedly emerged from. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.24.247.84 (talk) 12:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

subjected to ancientness.

[edit]

"these peoples were famed, romanticized, and subjected to ancientness."

I suppose it's coherent, but it feels bizarre to describe anything as "subjected to ancientness". Isn't it enough to say that they were romanticized? Nitwit005 (talk) 01:27, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"romanticized" by whom?
"subjected to ancientness"? what does this mean and who subjected them to the ancientness? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:4040:2D10:5900:89F8:F0E2:51CA:5FE6 (talk) 14:19, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly the whole sentence seems weird. should probably be taken out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:603:1C81:99D0:7DEC:7F16:EA45:F04C (talk) 20:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rework of the Economics Section

[edit]

I am of the opinion that the Economics section is pretty clunky and could use some major overhaul, including getting rid of some of the pictures and condensing everything down to a couple of paragraphs of prose. I don't think the images of silicon wavers or the Eurofighter contribute much to the readers understanding of the concept of bavaria. There also is an entire section about oil refinement (including pictures), which essentially states that oil refinement is not a major branch of bavarian economics. I am not entirely sure on what to keep and what to get rid of, so if anyone has thoughts on the matter, I would appreciate some input.

I think the Economy sections on the articles for Baden-WürttembergorNorth Rhine-Westphalia could serve as an example of how it should roughly be outlined. AmbitiousAmphibian (talk) 20:32, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bavaria&oldid=1234684627"

Categories: 
C-Class vital articles
Wikipedia level-4 vital articles
Wikipedia vital articles in Geography
C-Class level-4 vital articles
Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Geography
C-Class vital articles in Geography
C-Class Bavaria articles
Top-importance Bavaria articles
WikiProject Bavaria articles
C-Class geography articles
High-importance geography articles
WikiProject Geography articles
C-Class Germany articles
Top-importance Germany articles
WikiProject Germany articles
 



This page was last edited on 15 July 2024, at 16:40 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki