This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
“Pīnyīn” would indicate that it is a loan word directly from Mandarin. “Pīnyīm” (POJ “phin-im”) or even “pīngyīm” (POJ “pheng-im”) would be the cognate to Mandarin “Pīnyīn”. – Kaihsu (talk) 20:04, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Iûⁿ Ún-giân's dictionary says that both syllables in 拼音 have the first tone (pheng-im in Peh-oe-ji). There are also etymological tones. Why does this article use pìngyīm (POJ phēng-im) and not pīngyīm (POJ pheng-im)? Is it a mistake, or is it really pronounced that way? (Differences between Taiwanese and mainland Minnan?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Хтосьці (talk • contribs) 09:41, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Bbánlám pìngyīm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.