Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Length of the year  
1 comment  




2 Pronunciation  
3 comments  




3 New pic in infobox  
4 comments  













Talk:Bede




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Good articleBede has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassessit.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 26, 2006Good article nomineeListed
July 16, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
August 1, 2013Good article reassessmentKept
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 26, 2018.
Current status: Good article

Length of the year

[edit]

World Almanac issues from the 1970s and 1980s state that the Venerable Bede announced in AD 730 that the year was too long (11 minutes 14 seconds excess - the actual year length being 365 days, 5 hours, 48 minutes, 46 seconds), though nothing was done about it until 1582, by which time the error was estimated to amount to 10 days. There does not seem to be anything about it in the article. GBC (talk) 06:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation

[edit]

We give "beed" as the only pronunciation but it is not even the correct pronunciation of his name, which is more like "beda", even if spelled as "bede". AFAIK, it's not until (late) Middle English that "bede" would be pronounced "beed", but I am not sure when that spelling came about. Seems to me like it was merely another way to spell a schwa at the end. "Beda" is used sometimes as a spelling today in fact (schools named after him). Is there some better way we can handle this so people see right in the first part of the lead what the correct pronunciation of the name is? —DIYeditor (talk) 18:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To me this would be analogous to Goethe's pronunciation being given as "gewth", or Gödel's given as "gohdel", or Nietzsche given as "neechee". Surely, people do often pronounce them that way in English, but that is not how those names are properly pronounced. (Modern) English speakers may not be able to get those names exactly right, but equally well we shouldn't give a completely wrong pronunciation just because many people say it that way. Of course, we need to go by reliable sources. I am open to any solution to this which would put the correct Anglo-Saxon pronunciation closer to the beginning of the lead (or lede if you will). —DIYeditor (talk) 03:35, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Err, according to MOS:LEAD "In Wikipedia, the lead section is an introduction to an article and a summary of its most important contents. It is located at the beginning of the article, before the table of contents and the first heading. It is not a news-style lead or "lede" paragraph."
Back to Bede, when reading Middle- or Old-English I was taught to pronounce every letter. If the scribe made the effort to write it then he did so because it is needed. For instance words like þone have to be pronounced "thonuh" (short o) to accommodate the metre of poems such as Beowulf. I've never seen Bede's name in a poem, but would agree that DIYeditor is probably right, it is bi-syllabic and my personal guess (ie not RS) is bed-ah. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 08:14, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pic in infobox

[edit]

I think the medieval depiction looks far worse than the modern one and is just not nearly as good for the first image people see, especially when both depictions are imaginary. Does anyone agree/disagree? SaturatedFatts (talk) 02:26, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the medieval one is fine, even though it's not contemporary. It's probably not far from what a contemporary depiction would have been. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 03:28, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I like the current picture. Which modern one do you mean? —DIYeditor (talk) 03:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This was the original lead image, which I moved further down in the article to the section on Bede's works. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 10:09, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bede&oldid=1224285148"

Categories: 
Wikipedia good articles
Philosophy and religion good articles
GA-Class vital articles
Wikipedia level-4 vital articles
Wikipedia vital articles in People
GA-Class level-4 vital articles
Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in People
GA-Class vital articles in People
GA-Class biography articles
GA-Class biography (military) articles
Low-importance biography (military) articles
Military biography work group articles
GA-Class biography (science and academia) articles
Mid-importance biography (science and academia) articles
Science and academia work group articles
WikiProject Biography articles
GA-Class Christianity articles
Top-importance Christianity articles
GA-Class Saints articles
High-importance Saints articles
WikiProject Saints articles
GA-Class Catholicism articles
Mid-importance Catholicism articles
WikiProject Catholicism articles
GA-Class Anglicanism articles
Top-importance Anglicanism articles
WikiProject Anglicanism articles
WikiProject Christianity articles
GA-Class Middle Ages articles
High-importance Middle Ages articles
GA-Class history articles
All WikiProject Middle Ages pages
GA-Class North East England articles
Top-importance North East England articles
GA-Class England-related articles
Mid-importance England-related articles
WikiProject England pages
GA-Class Latin articles
Low-importance Latin articles
GA-Class Translation studies articles
High-importance Translation studies articles
Translation studies (biography) articles
WikiProject Translation studies articles
GA-Class Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
High-importance Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
All WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms pages
GA-Class Religion articles
Top-importance Religion articles
WikiProject Religion articles
GA-Class military history articles
GA-Class military historiography articles
Military historiography task force articles
GA-Class British military history articles
British military history task force articles
GA-Class European military history articles
European military history task force articles
GA-Class Medieval warfare articles
Medieval warfare task force articles
Hidden categories: 
Noindexed pages
Selected anniversaries articles
 



This page was last edited on 17 May 2024, at 12:20 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki