This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was no movePart Deux 19:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose —ISasha 13:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - WP:RM is not a vote, but a discussion, just like WP:AFD. Please state your reasoning. Patstuarttalk|edits 03:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I was the one who called the vote; That RFV stated my reason. —Joseph/N328KF(Talk) 05:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, the full form is much clearer, unlikely to be confused with one of their products or its founder. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gene Nygaard (talk • contribs)
What's the problem with moving, as long as you keep a redirect from the present title? go ahead, no need to poll... I'm not moving it myself as I don't care which of the two ways it is named. --BACbKA 09:27, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
I have asked that Beriev (the redirect page) be deleted so that this article can be moved there. As I tried putting in the edit for the move (before being told that page already exists there), if it is good enough for Boeing, Ilyushin, Tupolev, Kamov, Yakovlev, need I go on, then it is good enough for Beriev. --Russavia 11:24, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
