Contents

Talk:Bhakti Sharma

A fact from Bhakti Sharma appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 February 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that Bhakti Sharma is the first Asian woman and the youngest in the world to set a record in open swimming in Antarctic waters? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bhakti Sharma.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Swimming High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swimming, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Swimming on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwimmingWikipedia:WikiProject SwimmingTemplate:WikiProject Swimmingswimming articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. India: Rajasthan High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Rajasthan (assessed as Low-importance).

@ParulThakur:

Since you have added me for DYK credit, I cant review it. But let us do a parallel DYK Review so that you can learn from it. AshLin (talk) 14:13, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When someone presses the Comment/review button or the edit link of the page, details of the criteria to review appear autmatically on the page above the text box automatically..

1. New – within the past seven days, the article has

• been created (sandbox ? mainspace is eligible); or
• had its prose portion expanded at least fivefold; or
• had its prose portion expanded at least twofold (only applies to BLPs that were completely unreferenced before expansion)
• been promoted to good article status

1. Long enough – the prose portion is at least 1,500 characters
2. Within policy – meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular:

• isneutral
• cites sources with inline citations
• is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism

1. Format – fewer than 200 characters (shorter is better) and meets the formatting guidelines
2. Content

• interesting
• hook fact is accurate and cited with an inline citation in the article
• neutral and does not focus unduly on negative aspects of living people

1. QPQ – all nominators who have five or more DYK credits must review another article.
2. Image must

• be free (nofair use)
• be used in the article
• show up well at small size (100 × 100px)

{{subst:DYKtick}} {{subst:DYKtickAGF}} {{subst:DYK?}} {{subst:DYK?no}} {{subst:DYKno}} {{subst:DYK?again}}

(for instructional purposes only)

• New. Article created on 15 Jan 2015. Nominated 19 Jan 2015. Hence new enough. (Needs to be nominated within 7 days of creaion/expansion).
• Long enough. Present prose size (using DYK check script) - 1588 characters, 274 words (for this version). Just within the mandatory 1500 characters. Hence sufficient from DYK Point of view but would be great if it can be expanded even more.

...to be continued. AshLin (talk) 14:59, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]