Contents

Talk:Birthmarks (House)

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Episode coverage / House Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This redirect is supported by the Episode coverage task force. This redirect is supported by the House task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Wilson's Warrant[edit]

How would an outstanding warrant for Wilson's arrest not come up during Tritter's investigation, seizing of assets, threats to subpoena, etc.?

-- Maybe it did come up, and he just didn't use it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.215.121.16 (talk) 15:44, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Section was deleted because the original episode scenario is plausible on this point - in 1983, the year of the character's birth, the one-child policy was in the early stages of implementation in China. Depending on the whims of local officials who had to meet various population-limiting quotas (e.g. <1% growth for a village), the policy had not yet evolved into the more lax de-facto two-child policy that is seen in rural areas today.

-- Maybe it did come up, and he just didn't use it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.215.121.16 (talk) 15:44, 15 October 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.112.57.107 (talk) [reply]

On the episode Ugly, he talks about his toe next to the big toe being bigger than his big toe, but he says that he doesn't have that here. Though, perhaps that was just House's pure jerkiness roaming about.. Music is life. Live it fun. Listen to Ska! (talk) 20:40, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yet House solemnly admits that he has lost a father, to which Wilson offers his sympathies.

Is he referring to his real, biological father being dead? Zerocannon (talk) 14:30, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, what he means is that even though John House wasn't his biological father, he was still his father in the sense that he was the man who raised him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.169.239.158 (talk) 18:04, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since all my intents to make it clear got reverted, I'll cite my source, politedissent.com, which is much more competent than me speaking of medicine : "Though it’s not explicitly stated, the rest of her symptoms (basically everything but the abdominal pain) were caused by the iron overload (from the iron nails in her brain)" Isn't it enough to say that, YES, the reason why she felt so bad was because of this magnet, but then again, she actually HAD iron overload ???82.249.114.221 (talk) 23:00, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:48, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Birthmarks → Birthmarks (House) – Put back to 2008, redirect to Birthmark Birthmark (disambiguation). In ictu oculi (talk) 22:57, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Support, or redirect to birthmark. Many more people have or know of a birthmark, than concern themselves with any of the other listed meanings (oddments of pop music or of fiction, etc). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:05, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Rename per nom, instead repointtobirthmark as a {{R from plural}} per Anthony Appleyard -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:46, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• RM amended as per User:Anthony Appleyard suggestion, good point. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:26, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Support amended proposal per WP:PLURAL. bd2412 T 13:46, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Support revised move to Birthmark as per above. Zarcadia (talk) 16:20, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Rofl and support amended proposal. Red Slash 16:12, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per Anthony Appleyard, et al. ╠╣uw [talk] 09:48, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Note there are an awful lot of links that need to be changed now. I have fixed the template, should fix a lot of them. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 15:15, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thanks to you I only needed to make 12 non–null edits. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:34, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]