Contents

Talk:Blakely v. Washington

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Supreme Court cases High‑importance This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Law Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I think it should be a little clearer what Blakely did beyond Apprendi. I will work on that if nobody gets to it before me. Mrees1997 18:43, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Somewhere we ought to include _some_ mention of Booker, no? 14:59, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

I'm on it, as part of a general revision of this article, so that I can clean up the Booker article as suggested. ---Axios023 23:56, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the 3rd paragraph of O'Connors decision it says this:

"Bifurcated proceedings may become commonplace in criminal trials, so that a jury might not improperly consider prior bad acts during the guilt phase but properly consider them when it comes time for sentencing."

I think it's meant to say "a jury might improperly consider prior bad acts during the guilt phase". No? Stephlet 08:04, 22 April 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephlet (talk • contribs)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blakely v. Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060923115559/http://www.ussc.gov/STATES/blakely.htmtohttp://www.ussc.gov/STATES/blakely.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:54, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]