Contents

Talk:Blockade

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Blockade article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This  level-4 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

International relations: Law High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject International law (assessed as Top-importance). Military history: Logistics / Maritime / Technology C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military logistics and medicine task force Maritime warfare task force Military science, technology, and theory task force

added the egyptian blockades of the straits of tiran since this is a well-known example- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg 05:02, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What about the 1971 Bangladesh War where India blockaded East Pakistan? Sniperz11 07:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Data given for blockades of Gaza, which are in the news nowadays, seem wrong and self-contradictory. Where are the references for this? Wasn't the blockade enacted in the first Intifadah stopped at some point. E.g. before the one in the second Intifadah was enacted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.141.56.123 (talk) 13:04, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Willpower"? I can't help but feel that the Nov 2005 additions to the article have rendered it less encyclopedic and more like someone's lecture on how to have a successful blockade. Is it just me? Savatar 04:50, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i agree - in fact, i came to the discussion page to mention it. i don't think encyclopedic content should include howtos. 192.223.226.6 18:11, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure if Turkey was involved in the blockade over Armenia in the example given on the last sentence of the section. I guess, that has to be checked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.235.148.131 (talk) 19:45, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The June 6 edit [1] by user UlfSamuelsson seems like a violation of WP:NOR, as the reference link [2] does not support the stated claims. 85.167.116.220 (talk) 20:26, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me this does not qualify for a blockade Koakhtzvigad (talk) 09:28, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request that sea interdiction redirect to this page. 70.247.162.84 (talk) 23:31, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blockade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170131144505/https://www.usnwc.edu/getattachment/85c80b3a-5665-42cd-9b1e-72c40d6d3153/NWC-1005-NAVAL-CLASSICAL-THINKERS-AND-OPERATIONAL-.aspxtohttps://www.usnwc.edu/getattachment/85c80b3a-5665-42cd-9b1e-72c40d6d3153/NWC-1005-NAVAL-CLASSICAL-THINKERS-AND-OPERATIONAL-.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:37, 9 December 2017 (UTC)  OK Jim.henderson (talk) 14:06, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]