The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This article should adhere to the gender identity guideline because it contains material about one or more non-binary people. Precedence should be given to self-designation as reported in the most up-to-date reliable sources, anywhere in article space, even when it doesn't match what's most common in reliable sources. Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example "man/woman", "waiter/waitress", "chairman/chairwoman") that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. Many, but not all, non-binary people go by singular they pronouns, which are acceptable for use in articles. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. Former, pre-transition names may only be included if the person was notable while using the name; outside of the main biographical article, such names should only appear once, in a footnote or parentheses.
If material violating this guideline is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other related issues, please report the issue to the LGBT WikiProject, or, in the case of living people, to the BLP noticeboard.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.
If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism articles
Takács uses both e/em/eir as well as singular they. The article currently uses e/em/eir, but should it? Wikipedia is a general encyclopedia, and many may be confused by this; English Wikipedia gets lots of views from those whose native language is not English, and even native speakers may be confused by this. As long as Takács is comfortable with singular they, which it appears they are, shouldn't we rather use they/them in the article, to enhance clarity and understanding? There is another approach which is to avoid using pronouns in the article at all, while keeping the statement about Takács's pronoun use intact.
If we decide to keep 'E', then maybe we could follow with either a parenthetical, or an explanatory footnote. Here are some options:
E currently resides in the United States. – This is the current version.
They currently reside in the United States. – Preceded, or followed, by the existing sentence about pronoun usage.
E (or, they) currently resides in the United States. – As written; the "(or, they)", including the parentheses, would become part of that sentence.
E currently resides (or, They currently reside) in the United States. – As written; including the parens
E[a] currently resides in the United States. – including the bracketed note; the Note would appear with the rest of the footnotes at the bottom of the page.
Given that Takács uses both e/em/eir and they/them pronouns, I'd say any of #1, #2 and #5 are fine. #6 is unnecessary given that they/them pronouns are one of the options and are definitely fine to use in articles, and #3 and #4 are needlessly clunky. GreenComputer (talk) 22:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Since we know the pronouns Takács uses, we should avoid #6. I'm (perhaps obviously, since I added the pronouns in the first place) in favour of #1 or #5. On the other hand, since Takács is happy with both e and they, #2 is probably also ok. Sorrel 🦉 (talk) 23:02, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to address the XY problem here - is a neopronoun really more confusing to a non-native speaker than using a plural pronoun to refer to one person? (Not that that usage is incorrect - just possibly more difficult for a non-native speaker). @Mathglot:QoopyQoopy (talk) 16:35, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm in favour of #2 because Takács uses that too and it simplifies the vocabulary. But then I may be biased. It would be good to get input from someone who uses a pronoun that is not she/he/they. ☕ Antiqueightchatter13:37, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: it seems like #2 is favored more than other options so far, although I don't know if we could call it a consensus. So why don't we keep this open for a while longer—perhaps a week or two?—after all, there's no hurry. Otoh, this is not a highly viewed page, so we might need to attract more opinions, so if anyone wants to list this at a project, or other Talk pages, that might help. Before you do, please read WP:APPNOTE, and be sure that any listings you post are neutral (i.e., that they don't let on what your viewpoint is, in the posting) and above all, please avoid anything that involves WP:CANVASSING, which would pollute the survey results. Thanks for all the responses so far. Mathglot (talk) 21:40, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
We should probably call out somewhere in the article that "Bogi" is the given name, and Takács is the family name. "Bogi" is normally a diminutive, but I don't know if we should add that, unless we have a specific source for that in this case.
The title of this article correctly names its protagonist following English standard usage, that is, given name first, surname last. In a Hungarian newspaper, Bogi would be listed as『Takács Bogi』(example: here). Hungarian (like Chinese and some other languages) uses eastern name order, which is surname first, given name last; so, for example on Hungarian Wikipedia: hu:Orbán Viktor and hu:Polgár Judit. The convention in English usage is to swap the order of Hungarian names to match English convention of given name first, so: Viktor Orbán, Judit Polgár; possibly because the given name looks familiar to us in English. (But we don't do that for Chinese; e.g., Xi Jinping is "Mr. Xi"). In a lot of cases of Hungarian biographies on English Wikipedia it's obvious which is the given name, and which is the family name; the names Viktor and Judit look familiar to us. In other cases, it's less clear, especially if the given name could sometimes be a family name; "Bogi" is an example, as that is sometimes a surname in Hungarian (also in other languages, e.g., Giorgio Bogi).『Takács』can only be a surname, but most English speakers probably wouldn't know that. So, we should probably mention something about given name/surname in the article. (If you want to max out your confusion about Hungarian first name/last name vs. given name/surname, check out Talk:Peter Bence.)
Beyond name order, there's also the issue of nickname/diminutive vs. completely spelled out name: normally "Bogi" would be a diminutive for "Boglárka" (emphasis on the first syllable, as with every word in Hungarian, regardless of diacritical marks; listen), which is a popular girl's name in Hungary. German Wikipedia already has an article with the name de:Boglárka Takács, however she is a Hungarian sprinter, and if en-wiki ends up having an article about her, we might need to create a disambig page for the two articles, or have hatnotes at the top for navigation. Mathglot (talk) 00:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
