| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bouldering article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | Bouldering has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 20, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Someone did not read Template:Rp/doc before using {{Rp}} all over the place. That template is for when the same source is cited numerous times at different pages, and most uses of it in this article need to be replaced by moving the page numbers into the citations. Only a few sources are cited multiple times at non-contiguous pages.
Also, all the cases of {{rp|ch. 1}}, etc., need to be replaced with specific page numbers. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 11:33, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bouldering. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:24, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Bouldering. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{dead link}} tag to http://www.ifsc-climbing.org/images/World_competitions/Event_regulations/IFSC_Rules_2013_V1-2.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:13, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
Can we take a vote on which image is more relevant to keep for the main photo of this article?
1:
2:
I do not like the photo #1 as the main image as I find the too confusing. I was looking for an image where you do not have to zoom in to figure out of what is happening in the image. --Jarekt (talk) 05:48, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Of the additional options proposed, I still am in favor of the original #1 since the proposed options are uninteresting and quite generic. Looking for other peoples opinions or proposals. Rsriprac (talk) 14:55, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have placed Grading before High-balling since the V-scale is used there.Oldtimermath (talk) 04:08, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"Using chalk can cause damage to the stone....removing chalk can erode the surface of the stone"
Seriously? I am actually almost convinced this is supposed to be a joke. Is someone posting satire on here, trolling us all? Or are the just not familiar with how reality works?
Now, if they are your rocks and you don't like the visual defacement of your rocks, fine. But that doesn't belong under the heading of "environmental concerns". Rocks erode, a few millimeters isn't going to change the world for the worse. Idumea47b (talk) 18:01, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
