Contents

Talk:Brahminy kite

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Birds Mid‑importance Brahminy kite is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Birds To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more) Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more) Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more) Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more) NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more) Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more) Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more) Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more) Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more) Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles. More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo. Australia Low‑importance Brahminy kite is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Indonesia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Southeast Asia: Laos Start‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Laos.

Dead Fish[edit]

Just wondering about the statement that they feed on "dead fish" in the introduction - is the term "dead" necessary? Perhaps they don't catch live fish to eat and only scavenge dead ones not sure so just wondering. djambalawa (talk) 01:43, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they are mainly carrion eaters and are not like Osprey or Fishing eagles. Shyamal (talk) 02:31, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Elang bondhol? Please read Elang brondhol. Kind regards, Yos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yospangsada (talk • contribs) 03:21, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I stumbled on some interesting comments in an obscure article by Edward Blyth ("Catalogue of Nepâlese Birds presented to the Asiatic Society, duly named and classified by the Donor, Mr. Hodgson, [and revised by the Society's Curator]", The journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, vol. 12, no. 136, pp. 301–313.)

1. Gives common names "Brahminee Cheele" and "Sunkur Cheele" p. 304

   "The diminutive group [within Haliaëtus] with comparatively feeble talons, exemplified by H. Pondicerianus (the Brahminee CheeleorSunkur Cheele of India), and the Australian H. leucosternus, Gould, P. Z. S. 1837, p. 138. To this division Mr. Gould has since applied the term Haliastur."

2. Disagreements over placing brahminy kite in HaliaeetusorMilvus p. 308

   "It is curious to remark the difference of opinion expressed with regard to the systematic position of this well known species", followed by some choice quotes from Hodgson and Jameson.

3. Relatedness of Milvus and Haliaeetus [also p. 308]

   "For my own part, I have long regarded the true Milvi as being closely related by affinity to the Haliaëti or Ernes, ..."

Not sure if any of this is usable in the article, and I haven't had any luck finding an etymology for "cheele".

Pelagic (talk) 06:16, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Brahminy kite" change of 2021-02-13 15:13: «Chil is more often used for Milvus migrans»

Then why does the entry for Chil under List of The Jungle Book characters#Animal characters mention the brahminy kite by name with wikilink ? Tonymec (talk) 15:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is uncited there, I have removed that claim there. Shyamal (talk) 15:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]