 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Oh dear, we have opened a can of worms here, haven't we comrades? OK, I will abstain from any further comments about Kim (no relation) Carr and the Anstey branch if the SL editors exercise similar restraint. We don't want this article to reflect more badly on the ALP than the facts merit, now do we? Adam 01:17, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting to note Andrew Murray, Democrats windbag has called for the criminalisation of branch stacking, maybe we should something about that. Newshounder 03:15, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
That would be an unwarranted interference by the state in the internal affairs of voluntary associations. The state does have an interest in the financial probity of political parties which get public funding (see the Pauline Hanson fraud case), but beyond that these are not matters of public interest. Adam 05:20, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
There is a Conference paper on the subject of branch stacking delivered at the ANU in 2000 that claims it is widely practiced in the Victorian ALP and is largely ethnic.
The paper may be downloaded at http://apsa2000.anu.edu.au/confpapers/Downloadingpapers.htm from the list of refereed papers under Allan, Lyle (ANZ politics stream), The big branch stack. Recruitment strategies and the influence of ethnic groups and factions in the Victorian ALP.
Ṭ==other parties (other than alp)== With only a small amount of imagination (and a slight grasp of human pscychology) would indicate that of course all political parties/unions etc (in fact whereever political behaviour applies) branch stacking occurs. Joan Gos 05:36, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is an evidence-based encyclopaedia, not an imagination-based one. Adam 05:48, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Surely youre not saying that in all other ausrtralian political parties a form of leninist centrism obtains? Where everyone is both publically and privately at one with the leadership?Joan Gos 05:53, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well I would be grateful if someone could show me evidence of factions in ALP? Things such as times of meetings, memberships lists, minutes of meetings, apologies etc. They are just convenient journalistic cliches to describe constantly changing allegiances. Adam asserts that they exist --but no evidence is forthcoming.Lentisco 06:00, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That is quite untrue. In the ALP the factions are formal organisations with secretaries, bank accounts, membership lists etc etc. This fact is widely known and any google for Socialist LeftorLabor Unity will confirm it. Adam 06:16, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Anhyway this is not an article about factions, it is about branch stacking. Branch stacking is a well-known fact in the ALP, and also exists in the Liberal Party (at least one Liberal branch was dissolved earlier this year after being stacked during a state preselection). I want to see some EVIDENCE that branch stacking takes place in the Greens or the Democrats. Until such evidence appears, I will delete this unsourced assertion. Adam 06:19, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The phrase The policy positions of the conference were negotiated through leaders of the three factions says it all really. The phrases this fact is widely known and well-known fact arent evidence and dont really convince me of their actuality. But you two alp apparatchiks Adam and Slac seem to be convinced-and thats the main thing isnt it? Lentisco 06:29, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If are ALP apparatchiks you might do us the courtesy of acknowledging that we know something about the ALP. We are stating, we are admitting, that there are factions and branch-stacking in the ALP, OK? That is not the issue. The issus is the statement about "other parties." If you want the article to refer to '"other parties" then you must produce some evidence for that reference. Adam 06:34, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of the material and a list of references have been removed. Is this necessary? There is no material about Victoria on the present article. Nor is there any history. I suspect this is vandalism by the staff of a Victorian Labor Unity MP.
Some material from Victoria ought to be present. The list of references ought to be present. The article as it presently stands is next to useless to anyone who wants to do further research in the area. Also there are equivalents in other countries, but nothing like the practice in Australia. Most of the research was done in the Journal People and Place. This journal is disliked by certain Labor Unity MPs from the Right. That all references to this journal, which is edited by the academic Birrell at Monash, have been removed looks very suspicious. Perhaps because Birrell is related to a former Liberal Minister in Victoria. Also the definition looks like some material in a book by an academic named McGrath, yet it has not been referenced and McGrath's works have been deleted also. Again very suspicious.121.214.57.15 (talk) 09:53, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The vandalism of this article is not caused by the ALP Right. It is the work of a West Australian editor and WP administrator, possibly an ALP member, who has an apparent dislike of an unimportant Victorian who never submitted his PhD thesis (and supervisors do that when they think the thesis will most likely be failed), as well as Bob Birrell and Amy McGrath. He should have declared his conflict of interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.219.56.98 (talk) 15:13, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What is branch stacking called in other countries?
Especially USA, UK.
MBG02 (talk) 01:55, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Point3...;
Seems (to me) like normal (admin) operations… of any organisation or group. (Clubs, Organisations, Parties, are formed with a [supposed] agreed set of values or interests).
Perhaps a bit of explanation of why stacking is “necessary”... can't the head honcho of any party designate who gets pre-selected?
MBG02 (talk) 02:06, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In this article on 'branch stacking' there is a mention of a WhatsApp group called 'The Clan'. Shouldn't there be a reference to it (link) on the disambiguation page for 'The Clan'? (apologies if this is not the correct method for making this suggestion - I'm still learning my way around.) Dccharron (talk) 09:02, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
