| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article seems negative to me. I am not sure how to approach editing this article so it would nice to see what some other people think regarding this article's neutrality. --Barinade2151 03:43, May 20, 2005 (UTC)
Hi, As the article's author, I'm probably in the best position to answer this. When I said that Elliott was "generally regarded as an ineffective minister", I was basing this on press commentary and a variety of web-sources -- not on my own opinion.
I still think the basic point is fair, but I see how the current wording could be seen as unfair. I'll revise. CJCurrie 01:33, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
CJ, this statement merits being sourced: "Some environmentalist groups were disappointed with her performance, however, and regarded her as an ineffective voice against the pro-development policies of other ministers." Regards, Ground Zero | t 01:52, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I believe I based this statement (in part) on Bob Hunter's Eye column, but I've removed the statement entirely pending further research.
Some of the articles I wrote a few years ago were a bit too casual; that's why I've adopted a more thorough approach now. CJCurrie 03:00, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Brenda Elliott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:50, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
