This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Proposal to merge All rights reserved into Buenos Aires Convention[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The article All rights reserved serves a separate purpose from that of Buenos Aires Convention. Multiple language translations are useful and do logically belong to the existing article while they would be redundant and out of place in Buenos Aires Convention article. Furthermore, redirect to that article could be initially confusing for users who never heard of Buenos Aires Convention. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ozizm (talk • contribs) 06:10, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I feel that they should be separate. I know roughly what "all rights reserved" is. I found this page searching for "reserved" so I could learn more about the specifics. I have never heard about the Buenos Aires Convention and would have never found the information I needed if that's what I needed to search for. And a page redirect could get confusing for short-attention-span internet users. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.173.49.237 (talk • contribs) 18:14, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The all rights reserved article provides information on the phrase beyond its introduction at the Buenos Aires Convention (e.g., its effective deprecation in 2000). Enough can be said about the phrase that it merits its own article. However, we should transwiki the translations to the existing Wiktionary entry. —Caesura(t)02:41, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I ended up here because I was interested in the specific phrase. Unless it's as easy to find buried in the BA convention as it is here. 81.130.123.18 (talk) 11:26, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I have just modified 2 external links on Buenos Aires Convention. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
