| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bully (video game) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find video game sources: "Bully" video game – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3 |
 | Bully (video game) was a Video games good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Former good article nominee | |||||||||||||
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
There's two "Settings" under Plot? The Development section could use an expansion. There's also not a Release section. The GAN reviewers will tell you of any other issues and they give you time to fix them as well as suggestions. --JDC808 ♫ 19:23, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I saw this listed on WP:GAN. There's a pretty major concern with sourcing. The Gameplay section, the Characters section, and the Development section all have no references at all. This issue was raised in the 2006 peer review but it looks like it still hasn't been addressed. There are a lot of sources, but it really needs someone to go through and map the sources to the assertions made in the unreferenced sections. Without said citations, certainly the gameplay section borders on original research, and it is a requirement of the GA criteria (specifically 2c) that articles shouldn't contain OR. Hope that helps. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:40, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
|
|
| Reviewing |
|
|
Reviewer: Hahnchen (talk · contribs) 18:35, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fail
In conclusion - the article needs an editor. It needs an authorial voice to go through the article and to ensure its consistency and comprehensiveness. Right now, it reads like disjointed elements with no real connection to the rest of the content. This needs significant work before being Good Article material. - hahnchen 18:35, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add the text that states Bully II/2 is in development or announced, if so please include a reliable source. The game is not confirmed nor in development. So if you'r going to add a text stating Bully II is in development or announced, please include a source. The following is a considered a source: Rockstar Games, GAMESCON, GameStop or other Video Game Retailers, IGN, SWEGTA. The following is NOT considered a source: Youtube (unless the channel is Rockstar or the following considerable sources), Other websites. --Big Brudda (talk) 20:47, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Big Brudda[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bully (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:42, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand why this IP insists that the Scholarship Edition is a remake and not a remaster. They don't appear to have any sources to back it up. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) 20:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Bully (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{dead link}} tag to http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3170883&p=1{{dead link}} tag to http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/bullyscholarshipedition/review.html?part=rss&tag=gs_all_games&subj=6200387When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:31, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any source for the release dates listed here?
All I can find indicates that Canis Canem Edit was released on the 27th of October in Europe, and I can't find anything about Australia. SimonBestia (talk) 18:31, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
[1]
[2][reply]
References
