 | Cædwalla is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||
 | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 9, 2009. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 13, 2004.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Caedwalla of Wessex conquered southeast England during his brief 7th century reign?
| |||||||||
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 20, 2017. | |||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cædwalla article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yorke (p. 137) and Stenton (p. 70, 3rd edn) both say Bede says Cædwalla was seriously wounded in taking the Isle of Wight. I can't find this in the edition I have, and I wonder if this is actually a reference to the Whitby life of Wilfrid, which I don't have access to. I'm going to include a mention in the article but source it just to Stenton; it's clear some primary source supports it so I don't think I need to keep it out of the article. If anyone can find the reference, please leave a note here. Thanks. Mike Christie (talk) 17:38, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I abbreviated this: "His name is an anglicized derivation from the British Cadwallon, itself derived from Catuvellauni the pre-Roman tribal name, meaning "Battle-expert.""; the latter clause is unsourced and though it's plausible I can't find support for it. I'm putting it here so it can be re-added if someone has a source. Mike Christie (talk) 03:59, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The production of Cadwallon from Catuvellaun(us), simply follows the sound shift that produced the change of Old British into Early Welsh. The same shift produced Maelgwn from Maglocunus, Cynglas from Cuneglassus and Caradog/Cradoc from Caratacus. The meaning of the name Catuvellauni is not perfectly clear it contains the element 'cat' which definitely meant 'battle,' 'vellaunus' ('gwallon' in Early Welsh) possibly meant 'expert' or 'skilled' or perhaps 'ruler.'
Caedwalla's brother's name, Mul, is an OE word derived from the Latin mulus, meaning mule.
It is interesting that Bede never commented on the British origins of the names of many of the central persons in his writings, Caedwalla, St. Chad and his two brothers (one called Cynebil = Cunobelin) and Caedmon the father of English divine music/poetry.
Urselius 11:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have found a very nice intermediate name form, in one 'Catwallaun Lauhir' who expelled the Irish from Anglesey in about 500AD (Morris, J., The Age of Arthur Weidenfeld and Nicolson (1973) Vol. I p.125). The progression: Catuvellaun(us)(i) - Catwallaun - Cadwallon - Caedwalla is quite convincing.
The etymology of 'Mul = halfbreed' is suggested in Rutherford Davis, K. Britons and Saxons The Chiltern region 400-700, Phillimore (1982). p.121.
I can't believe I am the only one to ever notice the Catuvellauni - Cadwallon connection, I'm sure I must have read it somewhere. I'll continue looking.
Urselius 19:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Patrick Wormald, in "The Anglo-Saxons" (ed. Campbell) says that there is evidence Cædwalla was regarded as a bretwalda by some, but not by all. He says in the notes that his overall discussion of the bretwaldas will be defended in a "forthcoming publication". I think his comment needs a source that gives the argument, so I'm omitting it for now. If someone has a better source for this, please add it. Mike Christie (talk) 10:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The title of Bretwalda seems to closely mirror that of Ard Ri (High King) in Ireland. The Irish recognised two forms of this title "with opposition" or "without opposition." The former would encompass Rory O'Connor at the time of Strongbow, the latter Niall of the Nine Hostages around 400AD. It seems that a certain level of recognition would allow the rightful use of the title but only those kings who could exert enough force to be universally recognised qualified for the "without opposition" clause. It may be that the claims to Bretwalda-ship were treated similarly by contemporaries. I can't remember if Offa of Mercia is recognised as a Bretwada, though he did title himself as "Basileus of the Whole World of Britain!"
Urselius 11:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Caedwalla may have been following the precident of Contantine the Great in reserving baptism for his deathbed. A man on his deathbed can commit no further sin.
With reference to supporting Caedwalla's Christianity previous to his abdication, and to make a point that bloodthirstiness in pursuit of political advantage and Christian attitudes can coexist, the episode in Bede (Chapter XVI) concerning Caedwalla's agreement that the two young brothers of the last king of Wight be converted and baptised before they were executed could be usefully introduced. Caedwalla was obviously bent on exterminating the royal family of Wight, an effective way of crushing dissent, if harsh.
Urselius 20:21, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think the point needs to be made that the so called charter of his founding a monastery at Hoo in Kent is suspect because only the Peterborough version of the ASC refers to it and they claimed it was a property of theirs in the late tenth century when the Anglo Saxon kingdoms were united. As Caedwalla had no relation with East Anglian foundations and had no effective control over Kent after the anti-Mul revolt, the whole matter is dubious. Tony S 89.168.46.111 (talk) 06:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am having trouble making sense of the first paragraph:
He was exiled as a youth, and during this time attacked the South Saxons and killed their king, Æthelwealh, in what is now Sussex. Cædwalla was unable to hold the territory ...
Exiled from where?
"During this time" –- what time?
Was it their own king that the South Saxons killed?
"what is now Sussex" –- Sussex is now a county rather than a kingdom, but I think the borders are little changed.
What territory was Cædwalla unable to hold, and how had he got hold of it? Was he still in exile at the time?
Maproom (talk) 13:33, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done --71.163.153.146 (talk) 22:09, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Mike Christie, you haven't edited the article since just before this edit, on a matter you took issue with earlier. What do you think? Drmies (talk) 16:44, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Cerdic of Wessex which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
