Cadet scandal has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 17, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org
|
This article was created or improved during WikiProject Latin America's "Latin American and the Caribbean 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out! |
A fact from Cadet scandal appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 July 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The result was: promotedbyCwmhiraeth (talk) 06:27, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
)
Source:
Created by Rumba Samba Mambo (talk). Self-nominated at 23:12, 2 July 2021 (UTC).[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
To the primary author of this article, @Rumba Samba Mambo: I highly recommend giving this article some tune-ups and then nominating it at WP:GA. Nice work! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 21:07, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
GA toolbox |
---|
|
Reviewing |
|
Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 16:40, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I will be taking a look at this! — GhostRiver 16:40, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
|
in the context of the Second World War, in which the country maintained its neutrality.fragment
Putting on hold for now to allow nominator to address comments. Feel free to ping me with questions. — GhostRiver 19:18, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]