 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on California's 10th congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on California's 10th congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{dead link}} tag to http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2004_general/us20reps20all20formatted.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on California's 10th congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:51, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This article is very confusing, in no small part because of the redistricting that occurs after every U.S. Census. It seems to me that there should be four articles:
Here's some prose that I wrote for the Jeff Denham article earlier today:
You'll note that the California's 10th congressional district (2002-2012) (which I'll call "CA-10-2002" for purposes of this discussion) and California's 10th congressional district (2012-present) (CA-10-2012) have very little in common with one another due to the 2012 redistricting, which made big changes to the map. Both Republican Jeff Denham and Democrat John Garamendi were able to get reelected in 2012, even though Denham switched from the 19th (CA-19-2002) to the 10th (CA-10-2012), and Garamendi switched from the 10th (CA-10-2002) to the 3rd distrct (CA-03-2012). CA-10-2002 and CA-03-2012 had way more in common (both physically and politically) than the two most recent iterations of the district known as the "10th district" (CA-10-2002 and CA-10-2012). CA-19-2002 and CA-10-2012 also have way more in common than the old and new "10th"; since Stanislaus County was split in half between CA-18-2002 and CA-19-2002. CA-10-2002 was miles away from Stanislaus County, separated by Altamont Pass.
I'm very tempted to start writing Draft:California's 10th congressional district (2012-present), with an eventual plan to rename California's 10th congressional districttoCalifornia's 10th congressional district (historic). That would keep the edit history over at the "(historic)" version of the article, and then the other three articles would be new articles. We could spin off earlier versions (e.g. an article about CA-10-1992) if we really needed to, but I suspect the "(historic)" article would be good enough. Thoughts? -- RobLa (talk) 04:01, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
