Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 GA Review  
5 comments  




2 Did you know nomination  
2 comments  













Talk:Carl A. Schenck




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Carl A. Schenck/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Vortex3427 (talk · contribs) 10:05, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sans the short lead, the article appears to be in good shape, so most of this are minor nitpicks.
First round, going up to the Biltmore Forest School section. I'll do the rest of the article in another update and then do spotchecks in a third
  • The lead needs expansion to better summarize the article.
  • Exact dates (including day and month) for birth and death should be sourced in the body..
  • 17th-century shouldn't be hyphenated when it isn't being used as an adjective.
  • Would However, [his grandfather] be appropriate? I don't what the family was doing in the 1600s would really matter to what his grandfather did. Response That section was/is awkward. I reworded it; see if that makes more sense. Basically, his grandfather had a governmental position, which also appears to have been influential. I think it is important to mention that his family was prominent and wealthy. However, I can't combine that info the way I would like to because of original research restrictions.
  • Bythird formerly trained forester, do you mean "formally trained"?
  • Vanderbilt first hired Gifford Pinchot as the estate's forester. Response what is your suggestion for this?
  • Link virgin growthtoOld-growth forest, and link sluice
  • Comma after not Schenck's
  • Link sylviculturaltosylviculture
  • did prove his worth to his employer This is pretty vague; how?
  • Change did borrow to borrowed
  • Schenck wrote Vanderbilt that things looked bad missed "to". "looked bad" is an informal phrase, maybe replace this to financial troubles
  • Schenck long term Schenck's long-term
  • link back pay Response There is not an article on back pay or back payment. Do you have another suggestion for a link?
— VORTEX3427 (Talk!) 02:15, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the infobox (botany name), C .A.Schenck has a misplaced space
Starting from Biltmore Forest School
  • provide provided
  • hands-on, practical Aren't these synonyms?
  • the Vanderbilt's lands Remove "the"
  • ideology evolved Is there any information on how it changed?
  • link longleaf pine
  • link redwood grove
  • Bylong leaf pin, did you mean longleaf pine?
  • comma after Biltmore Stick
  • written out is an expression, use a more precise phrase
  • As a modern historian notes, You already mentioned Hill earlier, maybe mention his name here?
  • However modern historians comma after "However"
  • Maybe "Personal life" should be moved before the "Honours" section? It makes sense chronologically
— VORTEX3427 (Talk!) 02:35, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Rublamb: You can ignore those, I guess they were typos
I've done a few spotchecks to verify. I also ran it through Earwig. It came up with over 80% identicality for the Duke University thesis, but that's only because of the quotes, so that seems fine. I think it's okay to pass this article now. — VORTEX3427 (Talk!) 21:41, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I am still going to work on the remaining comments. Your thoughtful review was very helpful. Rublamb (talk) 21:43, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk pageorWikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promotedbyVaticidalprophet talk 10:30, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

)

Improved to Good Article status by Rublamb (talk). Self-nominated at 20:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be loggedatTemplate talk:Did you know nominations/Carl A. Schenck; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation

QPQ: No - Not done
Overall: Fabulous work, you've grown this sapling from an acorn into a mighty oak, with no wooden prose. Just the QPQ to do.



Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Carl_A._Schenck&oldid=1210250522"

Categories: 
Wikipedia good articles
Agriculture, food and drink good articles
GA-Class biography articles
GA-Class biography (science and academia) articles
Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
Science and academia work group articles
WikiProject Biography articles
GA-Class Forestry articles
High-importance Forestry articles
GA-Class United States articles
Mid-importance United States articles
GA-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
GA-Class North Carolina articles
Mid-importance North Carolina articles
WikiProject North Carolina articles
WikiProject United States articles
Wikipedia Did you know articles
Hidden category: 
Noindexed pages
 



This page was last edited on 25 February 2024, at 18:37 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki