Contents

Talk:Cartesian skyscraper

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Urban studies and planning This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Architecture High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was provided with references by an Unreferenced articles project volunteer on 05 December 2013. If you edit this page, please build on the good work by citing your sources.

"This article looks like an automatic or simply very translation". Might I suggest that so too does this? And it also purports to be a template, which, from the look of the code, it is not. Is this meant to be a template? Does this template exist? If so does it contain the same (possibly self-referential) amusing grammatical mistake? Jameshfisher 19:57, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ha-ha. Very clever. But why didn't you fix the article? Shit happens. It was my manual intervention. I didn't find a good template for this kind of amusing texts. `'mikka (t) 22:57, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 05:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While adding additional references to the article, I noticed that the origianl reference cited is a dead link. Does anyone have updated information, or should we remove the citation?? Tcxspears (talk) 21:23, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]