| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Central Asian Union article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Central Asian Free Trade Zone page were merged into Central Asian Union. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (October 2012) |
I created this page after I read numerous news articles about the Kazakh's President's remarks. Archos 18:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Archos[reply]
This is not good, you are being sucked into a New World Order, they want one world currency in the end and One World Government. Guess what you won't be running it, some cocaine snorting money hungry power freak private bankers will be.
i will be changing this Page's name from Central Asian Union, into Union of Central Asian Republics (UCAR), i have foudn that the Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev, has used this term instead of Central Asian Union ..
references:
I think this is bad for all, One World Government, one currency for all eventually, is not what we want. We know what you are up to, you can't take over the world. Watch ya back! you and your families will be removed from existance. Pata Pleadies star system
This article and wikipedia are not the appropriate forum for a discussion of the pros and cons and personal opinions of a world government. I suggest you take such comments elsewhere. This article is to discuss documentablt facts about the proposed union, its details and whether or not it is in process of forming. Goodleh (talk) 00:53, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I removed this image for a few reasons. First, what is being talked about here is an economic union if anything. The republics would still maintain their own political boundaries. Second, even if they were to combine, it'd be surprising if Turkmenistan would be part of it, given their permanently neutral stance. Finally, why would the capital automatically be in Tashkent, especially if it's a union proposed and driven by the President of Kazakhstan? Otebig 05:39, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Otebig, Qottune shikerim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.174.226.86 (talk) 07:08, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have edited this a bit, for some reason the introduction did not have a mention of Tajikistan, although it is on the map and the table, and the map's caption was not about a economic union, but a federation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chipmunkdavis (talk • contribs) 12:54, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Central Asian Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:04, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Central Asian Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:17, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Central Asian Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:23, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Open paragraph mentions original organ was dissolved in 2004, but nothing at all about this in the main article which simply stops the history at 1997. 2A02:C7C:364D:A400:6D6F:712A:7659:FB17 (talk) 2A02:C7C:364D:A400:6D6F:712A:7659:FB17 (talk) 07:47, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
