This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horse racing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Horse racing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horse racingWikipedia:WikiProject Horse racingTemplate:WikiProject Horse racingHorse racing articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 21:45, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Great Leighs is now known as Chelmsford City and referred to as such in media sources e.g. here [1]. Article needs to be renamed, and the current redirect will have to be deleted. --Bcp67 (talk) 11:07, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
From that article, I gather this is a relatively new racecourse and an even newer renaming? I'm leaning support, though only if this is not one of those situations like the Breeders' Cup Distaff where we will be renaming again every other year... ? Montanabw(talk) 20:06, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, it's shortly to re-open under the new article and I suspect the re-branding is partly an attempt to move away from the failed first opening. In removing the speedy tag from the redirect page RHaworth reckoned it was too early to move the article, so I decided to put up a RM and see where the discussion goes. --Bcp67 (talk) 20:20, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Based on the previous history of this outfit may I suggest that it would be prudent to wait until at least one meeting takes place under the new name. Clearly some rebranding is going on but some much has been promised before that has never happened for one reason or another. S a g a C i t y (talk) 21:14, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Let's define "shortly" and perhaps get a sense of when they will hold a meet? I can see a benefit in renaming prior to a meet if it is in process. If there has been a change or ownership or some reason for rebranding that makes sense, I don't want to put up an artificial barrier. Still leaning yes, but would like more data. Montanabw(talk) 05:32, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's been granted fixtures for 2015 and I think the first meeting is due in January. However, for the moment I'm thinking of withdrawing the RM and waiting until racing actually resumes. "Chelmsford City" is an awful name actually, as the course is a fair distance from Chelmsford! --Bcp67 (talk) 15:33, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's a bit too soon. Given the history, I'd wait till they actually started holding meetings. If someone mentions Chelmsford City Racecoure I have to stop for a second before thinking "oh, the place that used to be Great Leighs". Official names aren't always the best: I can't see much call to move Newbury RacecoursetoThe Racecourse, Newbury. Let's come back in January. Tigerboy1966 21:43, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Looks to me like the consensus is to keep the article where it is, for now at least, which is fair enough. --Bcp67 (talk) 22:30, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Is this article ready for the change of name yet? Course has its first meeting this Sunday under the new name and is being generally referred to in the media as Chelmsford City now. --Bcp67 (talk) 17:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to try the RM again and see what happens.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Bcp67 (talk) 18:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support, this is clearly the used name. GregKaye 17:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Article has been moved - RM to be closed. --Bcp67 (talk) 18:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
I have just modified one external link on Chelmsford City Racecourse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
