Contents

Talk:Chenla

This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Southeast Asia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Former countries C‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles C This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Cambodia High‑importance Chenla is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.CambodiaWikipedia:WikiProject CambodiaTemplate:WikiProject CambodiaCambodia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Cambodia To-do: edit history watch purge Let us work in the best reference and presentation of archaeological sites of Cambodia beyond Angkor like Sambor Prei Kuk, Angkor Borei (Takeo), etc. Should disambiguate Republican Party for Democracy and Renewal and generally try to link up social conscience with right-wing values. I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts. But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972 at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine. http://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG Thankfull for this info. [Unsigned] Vietnam This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Middle Ages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

[edit]

Was it Indianized or Hindu?--Dangerous-Boy 10:25, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Both. The early Chinese records report a large number of Indian Brahmins living in "the city", plus a much smaller number of Buddhists. Inscriptions are in Sanscrit. The Chinese record customs of clear Indian origin, mostly those which related to kingship and religion. PiCo 04:23, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some info that I've read. Cite the book in the reference.

In Thailand Menam is the word for river, but often when talking about Menam one refers to the Chao Phraya River. As that one is the only big river when following the Mun River from its mouth beyond its source I suspect the article actually means that one. andy 16:14, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mm, it is now not easily read: 1) lacking of a certain number of commas, 2) very many parentheses and names of mothers and fathers. To my opinion, it'd be rather a bit simplified.. Josh, linguist (talk) 14:47, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The article has lots of sections bare of any refs, which should not be a big problem to deal with. I have, however begun to remove statements that are unacceptable in WP, such as: "This reveals that the Chinese rendered themselves as the superior race or empire, and viewed early Cambodians as mere slaves or savages that exist to serve the Chinese." (formerly in section Etymology) There is neither a reference to it nor is it precisely neutral.
ATBWikirictor (talk) 04:37, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sooo...the entire content is from here? worldlibrary.org/articles/chenla_kingdom ...or here? worldheritage.org/article/WHEBN0000742067/Kingdom Please tell me i am wrong

Wikirictor (talk) 14:09, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's the other way around. Those sites are little more than Wikipedia mirrors (scraper site is probably more accurate). Their content comes from Wikipedia. If you scroll down to the bottom you'll see the attribution in small print:

"This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc..."--William Thweatt ^TalkContribs 20:41, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are all these dead footnotes, that suggest copy/paste action. here is the first one: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chenla_Kingdom&diff=383264488&oldid=377385411 ...anyhow, i see if i can add some references. Wikirictor (talk) 17:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The content was added in 2010 by user 131.220.92.169. The ip address is of: PC.2016.RumdeKubisch.indologie.uni-bonn.de. which suggests, that a friendly person or team of the Indology department of the University of Bonn was/were so kind as to provide us with lots of detailed data. I think it might be necessary to make some alterations and concentrate on an encyclopedic plot. ATBWikirictor (talk) 17:20, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]