This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chilly Beach article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is there any limit to how many articles there are if not how come they are deleted? p.s. how come someone in Star Wars who wasn't in the movies nor books nor any other mediaum is entitled to an article? Just asking! p.s. please ad a new title for these as i don't know how sorry. p.s.s.s. does anyone think we should move the movie poster to it's article. Jamhaw
-I checked it was them, IMDB.
Are you people high?
-G
Er, that picture looks like it's been changed, the last time I looked here their colours matched up to what I saw on TV... Unless it has to do with a 1400:1 contrast on my LCD... --PrinceScamp 19:31, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The colours do not match what is in the regular show, most of the charcters look like they have excessivly high blood pressure and the bear rolled in something not worht mentionnig. Kc4 04:45, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can see the newest info is from August 2006. Where has it gone? Replaced by random news satire and other reruns. Are they playing the rest of season 3? Will there be a 4th? I could not find much info on the links. --Talnova 09:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Chillybeachisland.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 20:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Chilly Beach Movie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There was no "Shawn" character. Most of the other information is false too. Who added this crap? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.240.143.177 (talk) 06:22, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]