Contents

Talk:Chromatin

This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Molecular Biology: Genetics / MCB This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as High-importance).

Asummary of this article appears in chromosome.

The current text on euchromatin and heterochromatin being equivalent to the beads on a string and 30nm fiber are wrong. The beads on a string seems to be very rare in physiological conditions and the 30nm fiber is present in both euchromatin and heterochromatin. The difference between euchromatin and (the different kinds of) heterochromatin lies in the higher order compactness. (Lodish, molecular cell biology) Kuije002 (talk) 11:52, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Created a new and more appropriate image showing major chromatin structures. This is the old figure.

The new image is beautiful but the simple double structure helix is left handed, where the actual structure in cells is a right handed helix. It need to be fixed.

What is polytene chromatin? My teacher asked us to define this for Genetics homework but I have been unable to find any answers and wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Acarrell (talk • contribs) 22:13, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This page seems to be getting vandalised a lot, or am I just being an anti-vandal n00b? - Zephyris _Talk 23:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, looking at the Chromatin and DNA repair chapter: bad English and unclear phrasing, see also my comment below...

Wolfgang WolfGreg9 (talk) 17:11, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

solenoidal structure disproven

Nature 2005 436(7047):138-41 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.253.133.106 (talk) 18:20, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, updated now BooleanQuackery (talk) 08:21, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of work on 30nm fiber is decently old and some newer stuff does not find evidence to support it, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.054 & 10.1126/science.aag0025 are the top two that come to mind. Maybe some context to this section that the existence of 30nm fiber is debated and at a baseline is not strictly required for packing. My recommendation is to read the papers first however. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.76.8.173 (talk) 12:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article needs to include a section emphasizing the role chromatin plays in transcription, or at least a link to a relevant section on the transcription page (which currently needs a lot of work)...MDG38 16:12, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Chromatin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive {newarchive} to http://www.chromatin.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:34, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Chromatin/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Last edited at 02:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 11:43, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I was recently teaching mitosis, so looked up on condensation of chromatin. While I was browsing sources I found that some 2012 reviews / articles point towards no 30 nm structure existing - at least in mammals (fractal folding of 10 nm structure was the proposed solution). I'm wondering a) whether that is still the currently held view, and b) whether the info in this article needs updating, regardless of which model exactly is currently assumed to be most likely / best supported by the evidence.

Regards 149.172.147.203 (talk) 22:01, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I don't know why that's stayed on the article for so long. I've deleted the content pertaining to the incorrect 30nm model, but the article still needs to be updated with current accurate models. Here's the first two results from google:

[1]

[2]

Thanks for pointing this out. I wonder if it would be possible to reincorporate the info I removed into a historical/past research section, along with the images. BooleanQuackery (talk) 08:20, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

More relevant info showing that 30 nm model is false: [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

The updated models should be included in this article. (It's still likely that 30 nm chromatin exists in specific rare (or transient) instances: [8])

BooleanQuackery (talk) 19:38, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion the 30 nm structures shouldn't be removed outright, there are sources on them. The info on the page should be updated with later research. --Gilgul Kaful (talk) 07:23, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, it can be reincorporated into a historical/past research context. BooleanQuackery (talk) 09:46, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rgorasiya2022 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Rgorasiya2022 (talk) 18:39, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This entire section of the article requires extensive cleanup. I've fixed some of the grammar mistakes, but there are several parts of this section where I can't tell what the original author was trying to say. Unfortunately, this is not my area of expertise, so it may require rewriting by someone more familiar with the subject matter. Lumberjane Lilly (talk) 00:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Structure of DNA" chapter: DNA ist located in a nucleus within the cell, not: DNA consists of a cell nucleus!! next sentence: ..of the 2 DNA strands, homogeneous H-bonds are forming. "30 nm chromatin fiber in mitosis": ..accept that the axis of DNA coiling in nucleosomes lies perpendicular.... "Chromatin and DNA repair": repairing the damaged DNA; not: repairing the damaged cell of DNA... "Methods to investigate chromatin": ChlP-seq: select, not selected; transactivation, not transaction ATAC-seq: transposon-accessible...., not transposable accessible... "Noble prizes": none have much to do with chromatin, I would omit the table. Cheers, Wolfgang WolfGreg9 (talk) 17:30, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with deleting the table. Done. Genome42 (talk) 16:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]