This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.
If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Are "The Sound of a Handshake" / "This About the City" (2002) "Dead Dogs Two" (2004) really singles if all of the others are EPs? Arguably, The Sound of a Handshake is more of an EP, because the tracks aren't released elsewhere, while the other EPs are just tracks of the S/T.
Sound of a Handshake is actually an EP, while Dead Dogs Two is their only "single." The Peel Session was also an EP.
The unattributed quote "Just call it Hip-hop" is a quote from the lyrics of the first cLOUDDEAD record, but it isn't Dose that says it - it's a part of Sole's guest verse. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.16.138.140 (talk) 15:22, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fair use rationale for Image:484587252 d949cea2e6.jpg[edit]
Image:484587252 d949cea2e6.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Cloud Dead → Clouddead — whatever WP:MOSTM has to say about stylised orthography (and i'm still not entirely convinced it applies here), the band name is certainly not two words. Move back to Clouddead, then we'll discuss the capitalisation. tomasz.16:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The article is currently unreferenced, so no only is a meaningful naming discussion impossible, but this article is a clear target for a notability AfD. Add references to the article first, and then I'll actually offer an opinion on the name. — V = I * R (talk) 05:41, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's not really your opinion that's being sought, but, uh, thanks anyway. Being unreferenced does not make an article a potential notability AfD, being potentially non-notable does. But the article itself informs you that they pass WP:BAND on at least points #2, #5 and #6, of which only one is needed. tomasz.17:20, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My bad on introducing the space - I requested a move to Clouddead at WP:RM, which has now taken place. As for the application of WP:MOSTM, it most certainly applies in this instance. Kiss is provided as an example, with the usual styling of KISS rendered as Kiss on wikipedia. Nouse4aname (talk) 11:06, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Nice work on adding references, by the way. I hadn't actually looked at this again since my original post above. Anthony Appleyard actually moved the page, and I just wanted to mention that I fully support that decision based on the hard work that you guys put into improving the references in the article. — V = I * R (talk) 12:18, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Clouddead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
