Contents

Talk:Color Air

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles Companies Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Norway This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

	Color Air has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassessit.
Article milestones Date Process Result April 5, 2010 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 9, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the price war started by Color Air in 1998 led to its bankruptcy after 14 months?

This review is transcluded from Talk:Color Air/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Airplaneman ✈ 20:07, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a(prose): b(MoS):

   I'll do a huge copy edit to tweak some of the wording, since a first read through is fine. I believe I can do them because they are extremely minor stylistic/grammatical issues.

   Tweak of infobox & lead (please fact-check the infobox-I got the info from the prose)

   Fixes to "service" section

   Finish copyedit

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a(references): b(citations to reliable sources): c(OR):

   Checklinks clean. After reading, I could only find a claim to Color being the first low-cost airline once; the first sentence in the lead. I might have overlooked it, but it should be mentioned in the "Establishment" section as well, with a ref. Otherwise, suitably referenced.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a(major aspects): b(focused):

   Great

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   OK

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   OK

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a(images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b(appropriate use with suitable captions):

   I like the images :). The only problem is that File:Color Air Logo.png does not contain non-free use rationale, which can be found at WP:FUG.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Additional comments

An enjoyable read. Placing on hold for the two issues (regarding logo and claim to be first low cost Norwegian airline) to be addressed. Airplaneman ✈ 20:20, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review, and not least the extra effort of copyediting; some times articles just don't end up all that well written. The logo has been rationalized [sic]. Imagine—we could get away with those types of fair use rationales a few years ago. I've also found an existing source which claims the article to be the first low-cost carrier, so I added a sentence there. Arsenikk ^(talk) 09:50, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright; looks good, will pass! Airplaneman ✈ 21:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]