Contents

Talk:Columba (constellation)

	This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Astronomy: Constellations Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Constellations task force.

Confused[edit]

All the names of the stars are really confusing. you should include the distance of the stars in the constellation from Earth.

According to another wikipedia article, Petrus Plancius created Columba in 1598. (User:Eroica 11:59, wrote in 30 April 2006, apparently – according to a peek into the page history, please use ~~~~ to sign and date the comment, said Rursus declamavi; 21:52, 16 February 2007 (UTC)).[reply]

Petrus Plancius globe, or any replica, may exist somewhere. On that the matter might be resolved. Maybe just wishful thinking... Rursus declamavi; 21:52, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One thing is quite clear! Bayers Uranometria 1603 (Linda Hall version) shows that Columba was part of Canis Maior, as alleged in other places in the wikipedia. OK, so Petrus Plancius inserted it as an asterism, but Royer then presumably separated it into a new constellation? Rursus declamavi; 22:10, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some poor fool vandalism[edit]

I didn't care to report this for the pity of it, but this text I removed from Columba:

My name is Carey, and i own a star in this constellation! My boyfriend bought it for me for valentines day! AWWW!

If true, this poor fool Carey [81.145.242.52] got in present some kind of a certificate that her fool of a boyfriend was busted by those charlatans "selling" star names. Otherwise read IAU:s comment on this kind of frauds. Rursus declamavi; 22:21, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The photograph accompanying the article does not appear to actually show the constellation Columba.40.138.184.12 (talk) 15:24, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Astronomer[reply]

Can you give a proof of this? The image does seem to show the constellation Columba. The two bright stars are Canopus (α Carinae) and Sirius (α Canis Maioris). Winston (talk) 10:35, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Columba (constellation). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070427204116/http://www.lindahall.org/services/digital/ebooks/bayer/bayer88.shtmltohttp://www.lindahall.org/services/digital/ebooks/bayer/bayer88.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]